Donald Trump. (photo: AP)
02 December 15
et’s not mince words: Donald Trump is a bigot and a racist.
Some will think this an outrageous label to apply to
the frontrunner for a major party’s presidential nomination. Ordinarily,
I would agree that name-calling is part of what’s wrong with our
politics.
But there is a greater imperative not to be silent in
the face of demagoguery. Trump in this campaign has gone after African
Americans, immigrants, Latinos, Asians, women, Muslims and now the
disabled. His pattern brings to mind the famous words of Martin
Neimoller, the pastor and concentration camp survivor (“First they came
for the socialists…”) that Ohio Gov. John Kasich adroitly used in a
video last week attacking Trump’s hateful broadsides.
It might be possible to explain away any one of
Trump’s outrages as a mistake or a misunderstanding. But at some point
you’re not merely saying things that could be construed as bigoted: You
are a bigot.
It has been more than a quarter century since Trump
took out ads in New York newspapers calling for the death penalty for
“criminals of every age” after five black and Latino teens were
implicated in the Central Park jogger case. The young men, convicted and
imprisoned, were later cleared by DNA evidence and the confession of a
serial rapist – and Trump called their wrongful-conviction settlement a
“disgrace.”
Since then, Trump led the “birther” movement
challenging President Obama’s standing as a natural-born American; used
various vulgar expressions to refer to women; spoke of Mexico sending
rapists and other criminals across the border; called for rounding up
and deporting 11 million illegal immigrants; had high-profile spats with
prominent Latino journalists and news outlets; mocked Asian accents;
let stand a charge made in his presence that Obama is a Muslim and that
Muslims are a “problem” in America; embraced the notion of forcing
Muslims to register in a database; falsely claimed thousands of Muslims
celebrated the 9/11 attacks in New Jersey; tweeted bogus statistics
asserting that most killings of whites are done by blacks; approved of
the roughing up of a black demonstrator at one of his events; and
publicly mocked the movements of New York Times (and former Washington
Post) journalist Serge Kovaleski, who has a chronic condition limiting
mobility.
He hasn’t gone after Jews recently, but his backers
have, and Trump was uncharacteristically silent when prominent booster
Ann Coulter, responding to Republican candidates’ support for Israel in a
debate, tweeted: “How many f---ing Jews do these people think there are in the United States?”
Though all Trump supporters surely aren’t racists or
bigots, even a cursory examination of social media reveals that many
are. Those supporting Trump tend to be white, less-educated and
middle-aged and older – those who are anxious and angry because they are
losing ground as the American economy changes. An analysis of the latest Washington Post-ABC News poll
by my colleague Scott Clement found that Trump, who has the support of
14 percent of registered voters overall, does particularly well among
white men who aren’t college-educated (24 percent) and white,
non-evangelical Protestants (27 percent), but gets only 3 percent of
non-whites and 5 percent of those under 30 years old.
This doesn’t mean Republicans or conservatives
generally are bigoted. I wouldn’t label any other candidate in the GOP
field that way (though Carson’s remarks disqualifying Muslims from the
presidency crossed the line) and Trump, though leading in the polls,
lacks the support of most. Thirty-two percent of Republicans supported
Trump in the latest Post poll, which means 86 percent of the overall
American electorate hasn’t embraced him.
Trump’s rivals for the nomination are slowly and
haltingly finding the courage to call the man what he is. Chris Christie
on Monday criticized Trump’s treatment of Kovaleski. John Kasich, after
last week’s Neimoller video, issued an ad Monday showing Trump’s
mockery of Kovaleski’s disability and saying Trump isn’t “worthy” of the
presidency.
Some Trump defenders claim the candidate isn’t racist
but simply “careless and undisciplined,” as John Hinderaker of the
conservative website PowerLine put it. When I called in last week to a
radio show Hinderaker hosted, he defended the treatment of the black man
at Trump’s rally (“he was obviously being disruptive and he was a big
burly guy”), Trump’s tweet falsely blaming African Americans for most
killings of white people (“he just fell for some bad data”) and Trump’s
embrace of a Muslim database (“that was brought up by a reporter”).
I argued that the large number of instances over an extended period add up to a pattern of bigotry.
“We’d be at it a long time if we go back through history,” the host said.
Exactly. Shouldn’t Republicans take that time before they nominate a racist?
No comments:
Post a Comment