Saturday, April 21, 2012

Ed Koch letter to the Editor of the Daily News


 
alternate text
On Monday of this week, I read the newspapers of New York City, as I do every day.  In the Daily News was an op ed article by Douglas Schoen, someone I have known since I ran for Mayor back in 1977.  Overall, the article was his telling the world and Mayor Bloomberg how much Schoen admired him.  I concur in that admiration and supported Michael Bloomberg in his three successful elections for Mayor.


Schoen in the course of expressing his admiration decided it was necessary at the same time to denigrate three earlier three-term Mayors of New York City which included Fiorello La Guardia, Robert Wagner and me.

I have a rule which I’ve lived by since first running for office back in 1962 for Assemblyman, which, by the way, I lost.  I’ve actually run in 23 elections, counting 1962 and including primaries, runoffs and general elections.  Of those 23, I won 20 and lost 3.  My rule is that, if I am attacked and I believe unfairly, I will respond in writing.  I thought Schoen was outrageous in his attacks on LaGuardia and Wagner, two of New York City’s greatest Mayors, and candidly, I thought outrageous in his attack on me.  So I sent a letter to the Daily News giving my reasons for my upset, which was not published.

I thought you might like to see and read the letter which follows.


April 17, 2012


Letters to the Editor
Daily News
4 New York Plaza
New York, NY   10004
To The Editor:

          I read with distress the reference to three three-term mayors in an op ed written by Douglas Schoen and published in the Daily News of April 16, 2012.  Mr. Schoen sought to buttress his admiration for Mayor Mike Bloomberg by extolling his virtues and accomplishments as mayor, while at the same time disparaging the other three-term mayors.  I am a supporter and admirer of Mayor Bloomberg and campaigned for him in all three of his elections.  I have said many times that the people of New York City have been lucky to have him as mayor and that his vision and accomplishments have made it possible for the city to achieve new heights and to come through the Great Recession far better than any other metropolis in the country.  He is not adequately appreciated and will be very much missed when he leaves office at the end of his third term on December 31, 2013.

          Having said that, I am appalled by Schoen’s references to two great mayors, Fiorello LaGuardia and Robert F. Wagner, as well as to me.  He described LaGuardia as having, “left the city in 1945 with a massive debt and a bloated bureaucracy.”  He described Wagner and his third term as “portrayed as a ‘city in crisis’ by the New York Herald Tribune in 1965.”

          Schoen described me as “Ed Koch faced a seemingly endless series of corruption scandals during his third term; those reduced his approval ratings to as low as 33% by June 1989.”

          I believe we – the city’s pre-Bloomberg three-term mayors in the city’s modern era -- deserved better.

          Schoen’s tactic of putting the three of us down in a cavalier manner in order to heighten his admiration for Mike Bloomberg would be described by the political cognoscenti as “tuches lecker,” a Yiddish expression loosely translated as “fawning butt kisser.”

          I have known Mr. Schoen for many years and, in fact, have used his services on occasion.  Long ago, I lost confidence in his integrity and accuracy.  I write this response because of a principle I adopted when I entered politics and ran for the first time for public office in 1962, and that is, if I believe I am unfairly attacked, I respond in writing.  Understandably, I much prefer the description of me by the historian Jonathan Soffer in his biography, Ed Koch And The Rebuilding of New York.  On page 399 Soffer wrote, “Koch’s tireless and personal lobbying campaign for federal loan guarantees, along with other management reforms, led to a balanced budget by 1981 – quite simply the greatest turnaround accomplished by any New York mayor in the twentieth century, including Fiorello La Guardia.  When Koch promised Congress in 1978 that he would balance New York’s budget, few believed he would accomplish what the Emergency Financial Control Board had been unable to do, much less do it one year early.  When he left office, debt service costs were reduced to about 11 percent of the city budget, down from 25 percent at the height of the fiscal crisis.  Despite many missteps and limitations, Koch laid the foundations of municipal government and political economy for the next twenty years, rebuilt areas of the city destroyed by fire and abandonment, and exceeded expectations when he took office.  If he had not succeeded, the cancerous erosions of neighborhoods would have continued, and today New York might resemble other deindustrialized, segregated, Rust Belt hulks like St. Louis or Detroit, where attempts at ‘renaissance’ have failed.”

All the best.

Sincerely,
Edward I. Koch

You paid $103,000 for Pedro’s fishy eats

You paid $103,000 for Pedro’s fishy eats

By MITCHEL MADDUX

Last Updated: 5:06 AM, April 21, 2012

For a pig, he loves his sushi.
video by Rafael Martínez Alequín

Posted: 1:38 AM, April 21, 2012

Federal prosecutors laid out in devastating detail how disgraced Bronx pol Pedro Espada Jr. lavishly dined on the public dime, particularly at Japanese eateries.

He billed his publicly funded health clinic about $103,000 for meals between 2005 and 2009, including more than $20,000 for a staggering 214 visits to a single sushi restaurant.

He rang up another $63,000 in bills for nearly 400 meals at nine other eateries.

Representatives of all 10 restaurants have testified at Espada’s embezzlement trial in Brooklyn Federal Court that family members regularly dined with Espada — and tnone of the meals appeared to be business expenses.

The former state senator also had a thing about fruit baskets, say documents disclosed yesterday.

He charged his Soundview Healthcare Network $1,362.75 for 11 edible arrangements at meals over a 20-month period. Most went for birthday and Mother’s Day bashes for relatives.

But he also charged $96.45 for an Edible Arrangements birthday basket for state Sen. Hiram Monserrate in July 2009, a month after he and Monserrate formed a secret coalition with Republicans that temporarily took control of the state Senate.

But that gift basket was nothing compared to the $4,657.50 tab Espada ran up for fresh flowers, vases, balloons, teddy bears and other table displays and centerpieces.

For his wife Connie’s birthday in 2008, he charged $344 for vased pink roses and “balloon trees” plus $76 for a rose arrangement.

The spreadsheets revealed in court yesterday showed that Espada didn’t even drop his biggest bucks in his own North Bronx district. He preferred Westchester restaurants for 37 of 42 holiday bashes over a three-year spread.

That included $445.56 for Easter Sunday 2006 and $339.60 for Easter 2007 at Larchmont restaurants, $246.66 for a July 4, 2008, meal in White Plains, and $713.85 to celebrate New Year’s Eve 2009 in White Plains.

Espada was also allegedly double-billing. He received up to $160 a day in state Senate per-diem payments totaling $6,030 in early 2009, but also expensed $7,209.62 to Soundview for meals in Albany.

Espada’s legal team got their chance to start their defense yesterday — and it promptly blew up in their face.

Their first witness was Cynthia Prorok, a management consultant who audits community health-care centers for the US Health and Human Services Department.

But she testified that Soundview officials were highly reluctant to answer her questions about the center’s operation.

“It was a very tense environment. You could cut the tension in the air with a knife,” she said. “It was very controlled. It was like being in an episode of ‘The Sopranos.’ ”

The courtroom erupted in laughter, prompting Judge Frederic Block to warn, “Try to keep ‘The Sopranos’ out of the case.”

Assistant US Attorney Roger Burlingame asked Prorok what happened when she questioned Espada himself.

She said that when she asked about his unusually high salary and began to examine his personnel file, Espada ripped it out of her hand — so quickly it “caused my calculator to fly under the table.”

Burlingame also asked her whether it was “typical for community centers to have attorneys on staff,” as Soundview did.

“No. They need to spend every dollar they have to make sure people have adequate health care,” Prorok replied.

After the hearing, Espada seemed miffed about her “Sopranos” remark.

“It brings forth a certain ugliness that is the underbelly of this case,” he said.

mmaddux@nypost.com

Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/bronx/sushi_urprise_QvzaI9ViPARHA9pJfnrDnI#ixzz1sh1C9XUO
http://youtu.be/XD7SxqOsjkM

Thursday, April 19, 2012

Espada didn't miss work at non-profit for 4 years: health clinic big

Last Updated: 5:09 PM, April 19, 2012

He wasn’t just a political powerhouse.

Former Bronx state Sen. Pedro Espada Jr. apparently never took “a single sick day or vacation day” in a four-year period at the healthcare non-profit he is charged with looting, a witness testified today.

Instead, the clinic’s chief financial officer told jurors in Brooklyn federal court, Espada cashed out his massive allotment of sick and vacation time from 2004 until 2007 to reimburse Soundview Healthcare Network for “personal expenses” he racked up on its corporate credit card.

Espada received eight weeks of vacation and six weeks of sick time every year, and was allowed to bank it year-to-year, records show.

“Four consecutive years without a vacation day or sick day?” prosecutor Roger Burlingame asked incredulously at Espada’s embezzlement trial.

“According to the schedule, yes,” said Soundview CFO Philip Valdez.

Valdez’s caveat — “according to the schedule” — underscored evidence that has repeatedly showed Soundview’s books were a mess.

Valdez said there were “gross errors” in financial statements signed by Espada that were filed with the IRS. One failed to disclose the charity owned an Espada-controlled cleaning company, and another falsely stated that Soundview had no officers or key employees related to him.


Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/bronx/espada_didn_miss_work_clinic_non_b2NdsTdQAWIQQrppvseWEL#ixzz1sXeqSRR4

Video by Rafael Martínez Alequín

Wednesday, April 18, 2012

Pedro a ‘shade’ baffled

Last Updated: 6:45 AM, April 19, 2012

Posted: 12:39 AM, April 19, 2012

He was a powerful state senator and boss of a multimillion-dollar Bronx non-profit — but Pedro Espada Jr. couldn’t be expected to know whether window shades his wife put on the company credit card were a “personal” or “business” expense.

That was the argument in Brooklyn federal court yesterday as Espada’s lawyer tried to blame Soundview Healthcare Network accountants for recording personal purchases Espada made on Soundview’s American Express card as business-related expenses.

Espada’s wife, Connie, had used the card to buy $2,111 in Hunter Douglas shades that were delivered to their Westchester home, evidence at Espada’s embezzlement trial shows.

PEDRO ESPADA JR. - Blames accountants.
PEDRO ESPADA JR.
Blames accountants.

Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/bronx/pedro_shade_baffled_lNwsdnU7NPOYjMyHEhzM9L#ixzz1sUCeCNzy

video by Rafael Martínez Alequín

Pedro Espada embezzled from nonprofit Bronx health clinic to buy picket fence for his Westchester dream home, prosecutors charge

Government’s revelations kicked off fifth week of corruption trial

Comments (4)
The Mamaroneck, Westchester County, home of state Senator Pedro Espada.

Showalter Aaron

Pedro Espada's Westchester home.

Aaron Showalter/NY Daily News

Espada outside court.

Ex-state Sen. Pedro Espada Jr. embezzled from his nonprofit Bronx health clinic to buy a picket fence for his Westchester dream home and even a pack of chewing gum, prosecutors charged Monday.

A stack of receipts the government submitted into evidence show Espada went on a spending spree with taxpayer money to fix up a luxury house that was not even in his working-class district.

Espada, 58, once the state Senate majority leader, billed his Soundview HealthCare Network for a $697 Home Depot picket fence and a $2,092 garage door, which included the fee for hauling away the old door.

He also spent $4,523 on a front door and a lighted security door, $239 on a water heater and $1,055 on window shades.

None of the purchases were for his clinic, prosecutors charge. Instead, they went to renovate his home on Beechwood Drive in Mamaroneck, prosecutors said.

To illustrate the depths of the disgraced politician’s greed, prosecutors revealed he even charged the taxpayer-funded Soundview for a $1.09 pack of chewing gum and a $9.47 shovel.

The government’s revelations kicked off the fifth week of the corruption trial in Brooklyn Federal Court, in which Espada and his son Pedro G. Espada are facing embezzlement and theft charges.

Espada contends the indictment stems from a political vendetta. Using ignorance as a defense, he and his son claim they relied on advice from the clinic’s accountants and board that billing the nonprofit for personal expenses was okay.

But prosecutors counter he and his son knew exactly what they were doing and tried to cover up their misappropriations with bogus excuses.

They’re accused of using $500,000 in taxpayer money on vacations, luxury cars and fancy dinners, including $20,000 on takeout sushi.

Prosecutors claim Espada’s son was just like his old man, billing a janitorial company owned by Soundview for personal expenses that included dental floss and 25-cent parking-meter fees.

Billing records show that in 2006 the younger Espada bought his wife a $104 black pleated Elie Tahari dress at the Woodbury Commons outlet center in Westchester. But he described the purchase as “office supplies” on billing records to the janitorial company.

He billed the company twice for the same Red Lobster dinner in Connecticut, but included a tip on only one receipt. He also charged the company for a Sunday afternoon lunch at a Westport, Conn., trattoria, claiming it was for workers at the clinic, prosecutors said.

Espada’s son also billed the janitorial company $53 for RiteAid purchases that included dental floss, toothpaste and shaving gel, which he also described as office supplies, prosecutors said.

If convicted, Espada and his son both face up to 10 years in prison.

whutchinson@nydailynews.com

Post a Comment »

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/pedro-espada-embezzled-nonprofit-bronx-health-clinic-buy-picket-fence-westchester-dream-home-prosecutors-charge-article-1.1062810#ixzz1sOTJSLQR

Espada’s $256K from ‘vacation’ hours

By REBECCA ROSENBERG and DAN MANGAN

Last Updated: 1:48 AM, April 18, 2012

Posted: 1:23 AM, April 18, 2012

Why didn’t he just take the whole year off?

Pedro Espada Jr. collected a staggering $256,195 payout for accrued “unused vacation time” — equivalent to 2,160 paid hours — an official from the ex-state senator’s taxpayer-funded Bronx nonprofit testified yesterday at his embezzlement trial.

Espada took the massive charge-off — equal to getting paid for 54 weeks of full-time work — so that he could reimburse his Soundview Health Care Network for “personal expenses” racked up on the charity’s corporate American Express card, the nonprofit’s chief financial officer, Philip Valdez, testified.

Thomas E. Gaston
Pedro Espada Jr.

Even with the $256,000 payout, Espada was $30,000 short for personal expenses he admitted owing the company, Valdez said in Brooklyn federal court.

So on Jan. 1, 2009, Soundview granted Espada his full, annual eight weeks of vacation — without him having to accrue it over that year — so he could take another payout against vacation time and cover the shortfall, Valdez said.

That was in addition to the astounding six weeks that Espada received annually in sick time from Soundview, whose stated mission is to provide poor Bronx residents with decent health care.

Valdez said Soundview repeatedly had to amend Espada’s W-2 forms — which reported his compensation to the IRS — because the charity had failed to include the vacation-time charge-offs and other perks he received, including a $30,000 annual “housing allowance,” insurance for a Mercedes-Benz and life insurance.

Espada’s 2007 W-2 was adjusted from a hefty $459,000 in reported compensation to an astounding $671,000, Valdez said. Espada’s 2008 W-2 had to be corrected from $300,000 to $596,000.

Even after this payroll rigmarole, prosecutors allege, Espada illegally claimed that a slew of personal expenses charged on the AmEx card were business-related.

One purchase in March 2008 was for $2,000 worth of sporting-event tickets at Madison Square Garden, which Espada claimed was a “staff outing,” a handwritten note showed.

Espada also claimed that dozens of charges for meals at restaurants in the Westchester town of Mamaroneck — where he lived — were business-related.

Espada’s AmEx bill, which routinely ran between $21,000 and $100,000 a month, was always paid in full by Soundview, even when the charity couldn’t afford to pay other bills, Valdez said.

One month, he said, Soundview’s alarm system was “canceled because of nonpayment.”

Espada himself was responsible for marking purchases he claimed were “personal” on the AmEx bill — all others were treated as business expenses by Soundview, Valdez said.

“If he didn’t mark it as personal, who am I to decide?” Valdez said.

dan.mangan@nypost.com

Tuesday, April 17, 2012

Espada’s $acked

Last Updated: 8:11 AM, April 17, 2012

Posted: 1:51 AM, April 17, 2012

Federal prosecutors unleased a torrent of new evidence against Pedro Espada Jr., and his son at their embezzlement trial yesterday.

Among them were receipts showing that the ex-state senator and his wife, Connie, used the company credit card of the Soundview Healthcare Network nonprofit Espada ran to buy thousands of dollars worth of window shades, fencing, garage doors and stones that all were shipped to the couple’s Westchester County home from 2006 to 2008.

Receipts showed Connie Espada used Soundview’s American Express card to buy more than $6,000 in home-improvement supplies from Home Depot in April 2007.

Prosecutors also showed evidence that the embattled pol’s son Pedro Gautier Espada used the company Amex card for purchases, for which he was personally reimbursed by Soundview even though the nonprofit was already paying the credit-card bill.

And witnesses testified that Gautier Espada collected two full-time salaries at the same time from both Soundview and cleaning companies that had contracts with Soundview.


Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/bronx/espada_acked_gXCqAZMB5fU81oDCHiHRnJ#ixzz1sIj1kIaB

Monday, April 16, 2012

Secret Service Scandal Widens to US Military

An scandal involving prostitutes and Secret Service agents widened Saturday when the U.S. military confirmed five service members staying at the same hotel in Colombia may have been involved in misconduct as well. (April 14)

Winding down his three day trip to the Summit of the Americas in Colombia, President Obama sought to offer hope for fresh start with Cuba, saying the U.S. would welcome the communist-run island's transition to democracy. (April 15)

GOP hopeful that Police Commissioner Kelly will run for mayor

Last Updated: 7:43 AM, April 16, 2012

Posted: 3:17 AM, April 16, 2012

headshotFredric U. Dicker

Police Commissioner Ray Kelly is being courted by a top state Republican to run for mayor next year — and the city’s top cop is open to the idea, sources told The Post.

Kelly, who has come under fire for the NYPD’s stop-and-frisk and Muslim-surveillance policies, could use the City Hall post to continue driving down crime and fighting local terrorism “for another four or eight years,’’ said former state GOP Chairman William Powers, who heads the party’s newly created statewide “advisory committee.’’

While Kelly isn’t enrolled in a political party, Powers said the state Election Law would make it easy for the longtime commissioner to run as the GOP candidate.

“I will be talking to the county leaders in the city about getting behind Ray Kelly, and I think he could defeat [City Council Speaker Christine] Quinn or one of the other liberal Democrats who are looking to run,” said Powers. “I think he’d get a lot of outer-borough support and the backing of Democrats who have voted for Rudy in the past.”

Powers, who like Kelly is a former Marine, said, “Ray Kelly is a great American and a great leader, and he’s made New York City safe and he’s made America safe.”

Powers said mayoral hopefuls like Quinn are using the media to smear the commissioner over his tough-on-crime policies, “because she doesn’t want to face Kelly in the election next year.’’

“When I read the awful hatchet jobs that are being done on Ray, in The New York Times, in New York magazine, by the Associated Press, to see how he’s been treated when he’s a national hero, I know that it’s being done by the liberals who are trying to stop Ray Kelly,’’ said Powers, who played a key role in Rudy Giuliani’s victory over incumbent David Dinkins in the race for mayor in 1993.

A source close to Kelly, meanwhile, agreed that certain media outlets were trying to “dirty Ray up so he won’t run for mayor’’ by attacking his “stop and frisk’’ policyand his efforts to track potential Muslim terrorists.

But the source insisted the effort may be backfiring.

“I think Ray Kelly can be talked into running, and I wouldn’t have said that a year ago,’’ said the source.

“I think his natural inclination is not to enter the political arena, but the more that he hears people saying that we can let up, that we don’t have to worry about crime and terrorism, the more he hears the talk about a more permissive posture for the city, the more I think he could be talked into running,’’ the source continued.

Powers doesn’t think party lines alone will be enough to defeat Kelly.

“Remember,’’ Powers added, “a lot of people didn’t think Rudy could beat Dinkins because he was a Republican, and he did.’’

Mayor Bloomberg named Kelly, a native New Yorker, Vietnam combat veteran and Marine colonel, police commissioner in 2002, returning him to the post he held under Dinkins from 1992 into 1994.

Besides Quinn, other potential Democratic mayoral contenders include Public Advocate Bill de Blasio, former city Comptroller William Thompson, who came close to defeating Bloomberg in 2009, and Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer.

fdicker@nypost.com


Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/ray_of_hope_for_gop_in_mayor_race_YqyTOONF2wxxF3699LgY7H#ixzz1sCvTcgu8

Saturday, April 14, 2012

Pedro charged Puerto Rico junket to clinic credit card

Espada and family racked up $15G bill

Comments (4)
Pedro Espada Jr., seen with wife Connie, allegedly treated family members to an expensive junket in Puerto Rico

Jesse Ward/for New York Daily News

Pedro Espada Jr., with wife Connie, allegedly treated family members to an expensive junket in Puerto Rico.

A JUNKET at a posh hotel in Puerto Rico turned into a family affair for ex-State Sen. Pedro Espada, Jr., with his Bronx nonprofit clinic picking up the $15,000 tab.

Federal prosecutors produced credit card receipts showing Espada and family members staying in six rooms at the El San Juan Hotel and Casino over five days in November 2008.

Espada whipped out the corporate credit card issued by his Soundview health clinic for meals at the hotel’s La Terraza restaurant — breakfast one day was $17 smoked salmon and $15 eggs Benedict — charges from the minibar, pool bar and even an $8.40 bill at a Starbucks.

It is unclear who was in Espada’s group besides his wife; his mother; son, Alejandro; and daughter-in-law and at least one child as evidenced by the order of chicken fingers and a kids’ buffet.

Espada was attending a conference sponsored by a group called Somos El Futuro at the Intercontinental Hotel nextdoor.

But he crashed in one of the hotel’s top suites which featured two bedrooms and a living room for entertaining.

Espada’s income that year was over $700,000, but he still received a $1,500 perdiem payment for the junket from the health clinic’s cleaning company which he controlled.

Espada and son Pedro Gautier are charged with embezzling more than $500,000 from the federally funded clinic for personal expenses.

jmarzulli@nydailynews.com

Post a Comment »

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/pedro-charged-puerto-rico-junket-clinic-credit-card-article-1.1061563#ixzz1s1isjUu7

Pedro’s family took $15G trip to Puerto Rico using Bx. nonprofit's money: prosecutors

Last Updated: 4:29 AM, April 14, 2012

Posted: 1:21 AM, April 14, 2012

He was living the “suite” life.

Pedro Espada Jr. used $15,000 of his Bronx nonprofit’s money so he and his family could live it up at a luxurious beachside Puerto Rico resort, prosecutors revealed yesterday.

That cash covered the Espada clan’s stay in a San Juan hotel suite, two other rooms, meals at resort restaurants, minibar charges, room service and “resort fees,” a witness testified in Brooklyn federal court.

The Espadas’ two-bedroom suite alone cost about $9,000 for five nights — and a single meal at The Palm restaurant during the trip there cost $478.38, a witness testified.

Riyad Hasan
Pedro Espada

Espada also rang up seven minibar charges, including one dip in the fridge for $109.24.

At the same time that the taxpayer-funded Soundview Healthcare Network was paying his and his relatives’ expenses, he collected $1,500 worth of “per diem” payments from Soundview for the November 2008 Puerto Rico stay at El San Juan Hotel and Casino.

Such payments are meant for meals and other costs associated with traveling out of town — costs already on Soundview’s credit card.

The damning evidence emerged as the embezzlement trial of the former state Senate majority leader and his son Pedro Gautier Espada resumed yesterday.

They are accused of looting the nonprofit Soundview and a for-profit cleaning company they operated to pay their exorbitant personal expenses, which were disguised as legitimate business expenses.

On its Web site, the San Juan Resort and Casino boasts its “old-world elegance” and encourages customers to “experience the timeless enchantment of the island of Puerto Rico.”

“Relax in a tropical setting amid lush landscaped grounds, cool ocean breezes, and old-world ambiance.”

Evidence yesterday showed that Espada and his wife, Connie, stayed there on Nov. 5 through 9, 2008, with their son Alejandro, his wife, Lizette, and Espada’s mother, Angelita.

Hotel credit manager Deborah Guzman testified to the dizzying array of charges racked up by Espada — on Soundview’s dime.

Highlights included a $129.32 breakfast featuring smoked salmon, tropical muesli, a turkey club sandwich and other food, as well as a $380.24 bill one night at the Japanese restaurant Yamato.

One room-service order was for $18.61 — for chicken fingers. And an in-room movie charged to Soundview cost $13.90.

And every day, Espada used Soundview’s money to pay a “resort charge” — which ran $217 per day.

Soundview, which is supposed to serve Bronx’s poor residents with health-care services, is largely funded with federal government grants.

Espada’s lawyer, Susan Necheles, tried in cross-examination to suggest that he was there to attend a conference at the neighboring Intercontinental Hotel and that he needed the suite and extra rooms for entertaining guests.

The only health-care components during the five-day conference were a two-hour breast-cancer workshop and a two-hour session on diabetes awareness.

Former state Sen. Pedro Espada Jr., his wife Connie and several relatives lived la vida dulce at a Puerto Rico resort in November 2008, racking up $15,000 in expenses.

* $8,919.10 for a two-bedroom suite with parlor

* $390.69 in total minibar charges, including a single charge of $109.24

* $478.38 dinner at The Palm restaurant

* $380.24 meal at Yamato restaurant

* $129.32 breakfast at La Terrazza restaurant

* $105.72 in room service, including a single $18.61 order of chicken fingers

* $20-30 per day in valet parking charges

* $13.90 for one in-room movie

dan.mangan@nypost.com

Darlene Mayes, 73-Year-Old, Sold Pot And Had Illegal Guns In Oklahoma, Cops Say

The Huffington Post | By Posted: 04/13/2012 3:19 pm Updated: 04/14/2012 9:56 am

Ganjagranny
GANJA GRANNY: Darlene Mayes allegedly ran a drug ring stretching from Tulsa, Okla. to Arkansas, Missouri and Kansas.

This granny's ganja wasn't for glaucoma -- turns out she might have been the biggest pot dealer in town.

When cops kicked down the door of an elderly woman's Oklahoma home on Monday, they said they knew they'd find some marijuana. What they didn't expect was that 73-year-old Darlene Mayes was packing 4 pounds of pot, $276,000 in cash, a semiautomatic pistol and a revolver, The Daily reported.

Investigators had been following Mayes' alleged drug ring for years, but they didn't know she was the kingpin until Monday, KJRH-TV reported. They believe she supplied about 40 percent of the marijuana circulating in the vicinity, which includes Tulsa and parts of Arkansas, Kansas and Missouri.

"That was quite a surprise," Vinita Police Chief Bobby Floyd told The Daily, an iPad-only news site. "She is in very good shape for her age."

Cops alleged that Mayes had plenty of dealers working for her -- including her son Jerry, who was arrested Monday, accused of carrying thousands of dollars in cash and nearly 2 pounds of pot that he intended to sell.

In Mayes' house, cops found the supply in her bedroom, which reeked of weed. A vacuum-sealed bag full of the stuff was found in the closet, and bundles of bills labeled "$15,000" were found under her box spring. They found a pipe and another bag of weed in the bathroom, and a total of $200,000 in more vacuum-sealed bags in a guest room where Mayes' grandchildren reportedly slept.

Mayes allegedly first told officers that the money was for her retirement fund.

"She knew exactly what she was doing and supplying and exactly who she’s profiting from," Mark Woodward, spokesman for the Oklahoma Bureau of Narcotics, told The Daily.

The granny was charged with marijuana possession with intent to distribute, maintaining a dwelling where drugs are kept or sold, and firearm possession in commission of a felony.


Thursday, April 12, 2012

New York Times

Setback for Ex-Leader of Arts Club

An appeals court judge effectively barred O. Aldon James Jr., former president of the National Arts Club, from the club, at least until the court rules in a related matter.

Wednesday, April 11, 2012

The New York Times

John Eligon writes: “After a two-month hiatus from public view, Representative Charles B. Rangel was back in the spotlight on Tuesday, hosting a small-business forum in Harlem and behaving in his usual manner: loud, witty, defiant and mischievous.”

Eligon notes: “Eric T. Schneiderman, the New York State attorney general, is creating a bureau to investigate criminal cases across the state in which convictions have been called into question.”

Danny Hakim reports: “Public employees are working without contracts in cities and counties across New York State, as labor negotiations stall because local governments say they cannot afford to raise wages.”

Joseph Berger notes: “New York University has agreed to reduce the scale of its plans for four tall buildings in Greenwich Village by almost a fifth.”

Tuesday, April 10, 2012

New York Times

David Halbfinger writes: “A state judge ordered Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg on Monday to release what is said to be a sharply critical report on New York’s costly, much-delayed emergency dispatch system, but gave the city a week to appeal. The judge, Justice Arthur F. Engoron of State Supreme Court in Manhattan, said the city’s rationale for suppressing the review of the $2.3 billion 911 call-handling system called to mind President Richard M. Nixon’s obfuscations during the Watergate scandal. ‘Nixon kept claiming executive privilege,’ the judge said. ‘The public and the courts didn’t buy it.’ “

Monday, April 9, 2012

Trayvon Martin Case Spotlights Florida Town's History Of 'Sloppy' Police Work

Posted: 04/ 9/2012 8:35 am Updated: 04/ 9/2012 1:01 pm

Prosecutors dropped the murder charge last August and said another man, still unidentified, pulled the trigger. Teresa Ruffin, the victim's mother, said the police overlooked important evidence -- including a witness who pointed to another suspect -- and allowed her son's killer to go free.

"They didn't do their job," Ruffin said of the police.

Ruffin, who is black, said she sees parallels between how Sanford police officers handled her son’s murder and how they investigated the killing of Trayvon Martin, the unarmed teenager shot to death Feb. 26 by George Zimmerman, a neighborhood watch volunteer who told police he acted in self-defense.

Police said they couldn't refute Zimmerman's claim and haven't arrested him, unleashing withering criticism over perceived missteps and favoritism.

"All this with Trayvon is just bringing the light on the Sanford Police Department," Ruffin said. "This happened for a reason."

Martin's killing has sparked national outrage. But it is not the first criminal investigation to upset Sanford's black community, whose leaders say police have repeatedly failed to properly investigate crimes involving black victims.
A string of recent scandals involving department personnel has added to community anger. In the past three years, officers have been caught demanding bribes from motorists, fabricating evidence and drawing weapons unlawfully.

"They're notorious for mishandling investigations, not doing any follow-ups on various leads, or saying that they can't get any leads,” said Turner Clayton, president of the local branch of the NAACP. "When a victim's loved one asks for an update, the only thing they can say is, 'We don't have anything now,'" he said. "Seems like they never get anything at all."

Sgt. David Morgenstern, a Sanford police spokesman, declined to respond to questions about the Trayvon Martin shooting or allegations of sloppy work in other cases. "We're not going to be able to comment on any of that," Morgenstern told The Huffington Post.

Critics of the local police are now seeing their complaints echo on a national stage, with a chorus of prominent civil rights leaders, pundits and politicians joining to denounce the initial Martin investigation as rushed and careless -- and biased in favor of Zimmerman. A special state prosecutor and federal authorities are leading the probe of the Martin shooting, and local police face intense outside scrutiny over their interpretation of Florida’s Stand Your Ground law as well as what experts call a failure to follow basic police procedure.

Trayvon Martin Justice

Among other things, George Zimmerman, 28, was not subject to a criminal background check until after he was released from custody. A possible racial slur muttered by Zimmerman on a 911 call was overlooked. Nearly a week passed before important witnesses were interviewed by the police. Perhaps most crucially, investigators failed to access Martin’s cell phone records for weeks.

Those records revealed that just before he was shot, the teen was on the phone with his girlfriend, who said she overheard crucial moments of the encounter between Zimmerman and Martin.

“Those mistakes should not have been made,” said Andrew Scott, former chief of the Boca Raton police department and a national policing consultant. “They were such rudimentary aspects of an investigation.”

Martin family members and their attorneys relentlessly cited these errors, which echoed through the national media and the blogosphere.

“It has fueled the fires,” Scott said. “The credibility of the agency is now in question.”

'THEY SHOULD HAVE HAD THIS'

Around 6:30 p.m. on Feb. 26, Trayvon Martin left his father's girlfriend's house at the Retreat at Twin Lakes, a gated community where he'd been staying for about a week, and headed to a 7-Eleven store to pick up some snacks before the NBA All-Star game. The store was a walk of about a three-quarters of mile.

Martin spent much of his trip to and from the store on the phone with his 16-year-old girlfriend back in Miami. The entire day had been much the same, with the two talking in calls of a few minutes at a time. According to cell phone records obtained by The Huffington Post, Martin was on the phone with the girl from 6:30 p.m. to 6:49 p.m.

Martin made it back to the gated complex just after 7 p.m.

At that point, Zimmerman, patrolling the neighborhood in his vehicle, noticed Martin walking slowly. Zimmerman called 911 to report Martin as a "suspicious person." The call began at about 7:09 p.m.

"This guy looks like he's up to no good, or he's on drugs or something," Zimmerman tells the 911 dispatcher. "He's just staring, looking at all the houses ... Something's wrong with him."

The 911 call lasts just over four minutes. Toward the end, Zimmerman says Martin is running and the sounds of Zimmerman breathing hard can be heard as he describes the location to the dispatcher. Some hear what sounds like Zimmerman muttering a racial slur. "These assholes always get away," he then says.

The dispatcher asks Zimmerman if he's chasing the individual. Zimmerman says yes. "We don't need you to do that," the dispatcher responds.

At roughly 7:14 p.m., Zimmerman ends the call. Less than three minutes later, Trayvon Martin was dead from a single gunshot wound to the chest from Zimmerman's Kal-Tec 9 mm pistol, which he carried in a holster on his belt. Police arrived almost immediately and found Martin face-down and motionless in a patch of grass about 70 yards from the back porch of his father's girlfriend's house.

Zimmerman told police that he was the victim of an unprovoked attack by Martin and said he shot the teen in self-defense, according to Bill Lee, the Sanford police chief who has since taken a leave from his job.

Trayvon Martin George Zimmerman

After pursuing the teen, Zimmerman said he lost sight of him and began walking back to his vehicle. According to an account Zimmerman's father gave to several media outlets, Zimmerman said Martin approached from behind and angrily confronted him. In Zimmerman's version, Martin punched the watchman in the nose, dropping him to the ground, and violently banged his head into the sidewalk.

Police have not revealed what evidence they have collected. In an interview with the Orlando Sentinel, police said they found no one who saw the start of the altercation. Police now direct inquiries about the Martin investigation to the state prosecutor"s office, which declined to comment.

One witness, identified only by his first name, told a local television news reporter he saw Martin "beating up" Zimmerman, who was on his back on the ground. But the man did not see the beginning of the clash, according to a close friend who spoke to him about what he witnessed that night. The friend requested anonymity due to high tensions over the shooting.

Martin's family said police told them the investigation was thorough, but turned up no evidence contradicting Zimmerman's version of events and failed to establish probable cause that he broke the law.

It is now clear that police overlooked Martin's cell phone records.

Attorneys for Martin's family said it wasn't until weeks later, when Tracy Martin, Trayvon's father, was looking through the teen's cell phone bill that he noticed the timing of the last call. The family and their attorneys then contacted Trayvon's girlfriend and heard her account of the night. Lawyer Benjamin Crump, who represents the family, recorded an interview with the girl and provided it with Martin's cell phone records to federal authorities, who by then had joined the investigation.

The logs, obtained by The Huffington Post, show that as Zimmerman was on the phone with the 911 dispatcher reporting Martin as "suspicious," Martin answered a final call from his girlfriend.

The call began at 7:12 p.m. Martin told her that "some strange dude" was following him, said Crump. She told Crump that Martin slowed to see who was behind him. The girl urged him to run, and he picked up his pace. Martin said he thought the man was gone, according to Crump. Instead, Zimmerman was likely closing in.

"He's right behind me, he's right behind me again," Martin told his girlfriend, according to Crump.

"Next thing she hears is Martin saying, 'Why are you following me?'" Crump said. "And she hears a voice that says, "What are you doing around here?' Then she hears what she believes is a push against Martin and the phone crashes to the ground. She can hear them arguing in the background. Moments later, the phone line goes dead."

Phone records show the call ended at 7:16 p.m. Police arrived roughly a minute later.

Martin's girlfriend's contention that Zimmerman shoved Martin at the beginning of the altercation is missing from Zimmerman's story, lawyers for Martin's family said. The girl is a minor whose identity is being kept secret by the family attorneys.

The failure of Sanford police to locate and interview the girl was a crucial investigative oversight, according to Gerald S. Reamey, a former police department legal advisor in Texas and law professor and legal scholar specializing in criminal procedure at St. Mary's University in San Antonio.

"It really casts doubt on the soundness of the entire investigation when you see something like this," Reamey said. "They should have had this piece of evidence."

Federal agents and the special state prosecution team that took over the investigation have now interviewed the girl, the Martin family's attorneys said. The police gave the results of their investigation to state attorney Norman Wolfinger, who withdrew from the case last month. The governor appointed another state attorney to take over.

'AN ELEMENTARY INVESTIGATION'

Reamey said it was possible the Sanford police investigation might have reached different conclusions if detectives had interviewed the girl earlier. "It could be quite useful in the interrogation" of Zimmerman, Reamey said. "It also could be quite useful for the investigator to understand at that point that there is some contradictory evidence."

With the state prosecutor's investigation still underway, it remains unclear whether the failure to interview the girl seriously harmed the ability to prosecute Zimmerman. But the lapse makes the prosecutor's job more difficult, Reamey said. "It's a burden," he said. "It can make a difference."

Investigators made another fundamental error by waiting more than a week to interview a young teen who said he witnessed part of the struggle between Zimmerman and Martin, experts said. Eyewitnesses should be interviewed immediately after a crime, before memories fade, said Scott, the former Boca Raton police chief.

"It's part of an elementary investigation of a very significant crime," Scott said.

Eight days after the shooting, investigators sat down in Sheryl Brown's living room to speak with her 13-year-old son, Austin McLendon. Austin, the youngest among those who told police they saw or heard the fight, was standing behind his family's home the night of the killing, about 20 yards from where it occurred. He recalled seeing a man on the ground, hearing screams and pleas for help, then a gunshot followed by silence.

A 911 recording captured the teen's impressions that night.

"I saw a man laying on the ground that needed help, that was screaming and then I was going to go over there to try and help him, but my dog got off the leash, so I went and got my dog, and then I heard a loud sound and then the screaming stopped."

The dispatcher asks: "Did you see the person get shot? Did you know the person that was shot, or did you see the person that had the gun?"

"No, I just heard a loud sound and then the screaming stopped," Austin replied.

Investigators pushed Austin to identify the man on the ground as Zimmerman, who was wearing a red jacket, he and his mother said. But he said it was just too dark and he was too far away to be sure.

"It was just too much in detail and I couldn't give them the answers that they were looking for," Austin told The Huffington Post.

Scott said an investigator who failed to interview a witness or check cell phone records in a homicide would face serious repercussions. "It's disappointing," he said. "There would be consequences with regard to the investigator that would have done that."

Citing these and other potential errors, including the failure of Sanford investigators to notice what sounds like a racial epithet on Zimmerman's 911 call, Martin's family called for an independent investigation.

Sanford city officials responded with a no-confidence vote in the police chief, who stepped aside temporarily. Wolfinger, the state attorney, quit the case the same day.

In an interview last month, Velma Williams, the lone black Sanford city commissioner, told The Huffington Post that growing outrage over the police handling of Martin's killing was not an isolated incident, and that the town had a "long way to go" toward repairing relations with the black community.

"You have to understand that race plays a role here," Williams said. "No one is conjuring up any of this."

"I think that we can begin the healing process and that can only happen if the city government understands that we must face the reality that there are some serious problems in this city," she said.

RUSH TO JUDGEMENT

For Teresa Ruffin, the Trayvon Martin investigation resurrects painful memories of her son's 2010 murder.

On the night of June 15, 2010, Ikeem Ruffin, 17, was shot and killed by a masked man during a robbery in an apartment complex in north Sanford. Ruffin had just left work and died wearing his McDonald's uniform.

Police found 18-year-old Tarance Terrell Moore standing by the victim and calling for an ambulance, but the teen was already dead. The gun used in the killing was never recovered.

The next day, police charged Moore with robbery and murder in Ruffin's death. He was denied bail and locked in Seminole County Jail awaiting trial.

More than a year later, Seminole County prosecutors dropped the murder charge, which carried a maximum sentence of life in prison without parole, in exchange for a guilty plea to a charge of robbery with a firearm. Moore was sentenced to nine years in prison.

The plea was no comfort to Teresa Ruffin, who believes the police rushed to judgment in the case, in part due to Moore's history of run-ins with the law. A year before the murder, police charged Moore with shooting at a patrol car, but the charges were later dropped due to lack of evidence.

"He was there, but he wasn't my son's killer," Ruffin said of Moore. "They just wanted to pin it on him and forget about the killer."

Tim Caudill, Moore's public defender, declined to comment because the case is still eligible for appeal. At Moore's plea hearing in August 2011, prosecutors said they no longer believed Moore fired the fatal shot, but maintained he was still involved in the robbery.

Teresa Ruffin said she's not fully convinced Moore had anything to do with her son's death. She said she wonders why Moore remained at the scene, crying for help, if he was an accomplice.

"Why wouldn't he run too?" she said. "It was very strange."

Ruffin, a pastor, said she feels shortchanged by the police investigation. "They handled it very sloppy," she said. "They don't care because it was another black person shooting another black person."

Such criticisms are hardly unusual. Community leaders and civil rights activists cite a string of homicides involving young black men that they say are unsolved due to lackluster police work.

One crime that rankled black residents is a November 2011 shooting that killed one young man and severely injured two others. Tremaine Patrick, 31, the main suspect, surrendered the next day, reportedly out of fear of street justice. Patrick, who is black, was arrested on suspicion of murder and jailed.

The Rev. Calvin Donaldson, father of one of the men killed in the attack, said police told him several witnesses saw an armed Patrick at the scene. Another witness was prepared to testify that Patrick tried to recruit him as a getaway driver, Donaldson said. Still other witnesses had heard Patrick threaten to kill everyone in the house where the shooting occurred several days before, Donaldson said.

The lead detective, Chris Serino, wanted to press charges against Patrick, Donaldson said, but he was overruled by prosecutors in the office of State Attorney Wolfinger. Serino and state prosecutors would clash again in the Martin case, according to news accounts.

"The investigating officer wanted to levy charges on this young man, but the state attorney's office stepped in and said no," Donaldson said. "Just like in Trayvon."

Patrick was held on unrelated charges for nearly a month, then freed without charges, court records show. Months passed with no action. Numerous calls to police and prosecutors went unanswered, Donaldson said.

"They had a cavalier attitude as far as I'm concerned," he said. "I think it got stuck on the back burner."

OTHER SIDE OF THE TRACKS

Donaldson convened religious leaders and local activists disturbed by the lack of police and prosecutorial action on crime in Sanford's black community. "We were very aggressive about going after the city manager, the police chief and the state's attorney's office because of the apathy," Donaldson said.

Despite the pressure, there were no results -- until the Trayvon Martin case exploded, he said. Police and prosecutors suddenly showed new interest in the shooting case. Last week, prosecutors filed murder and assault charges against Patrick.

"I think the heat got to them," Donaldson said. "I think they decided that they might as well do something in one of these other cases."

"Nothing happened on my case until Trayvon," he said. "That's when my phone started ringing."

Lynn Bumpus-Hooper, a spokeswoman for the state attorney's office, disputed that the timing of the charges was related to the Martin slaying. Prosecutors had simply been taking their time to build a strong case, she said.

"It's not unusual, especially on a murder case, to go as far as you can go before you make the final filing," Bumpus-Hooper said. "That is what drove the case, nothing else, according to the attorneys who are handling it."

A string of cases involving police misconduct has also strained relations with the black community. The city fell into the national spotlight in December 2011 after video surfaced of a young white man, the son of a Sanford police supervisor, sucker-punching a homeless black man trying to break up a fight outside a bar. The victim, Sherman Ware, fell, striking his head on a metal pole, and the video shows him lying unconscious while his attacker struts and shouts in full view of dozens of onlookers. He can be heard shouting, "Nigger what? Nigger what?"

Police arrived within minutes and obtained video of the assault and sworn statements from witnesses identifying the assailant as Justin Collison, the son of a Sanford police lieutenant. Collison was handcuffed and placed in the back of a police car, but was quickly freed without charges.

Tonetta Foster, Ware's sister, said the incident reignited racial tensions.

"It's like a railroad track runs through this place and we're always on one side and they're on the other," Foster said of the town's racial divide. "And the police, no way we can trust them after all they've done to us."

An investigative report shows that Sgt. Anthony Raimondo, the ranking officer at the scene, placed two phone calls to Collison's father within minutes of arriving, then overruled a junior officer's decision to place Collison under arrest.

Instead of charging Collison, the officers released him and filed a request for an investigation into the incident with the state attorney's office.

The next day, Raimondo -- the first ranking officer to arrive at the Trayvon Martin shooting -- defended his decision to other officers at police headquarters.

"If anybody has any issues with what happened last night, talk to me," Raimondo said, according to the report. "But here's my standpoint on it. I'm not in the business of putting cops' kids in jail unless I absolutely have to."

Collison was charged with felony assault only after the video of the attack was broadcast on local television nearly a month later. Raimondo and other officers were later cleared of misconduct, although one senior officer told investigators he believed Collison was afforded preferential treatment because of his father.

Wolfinger, the prosecutor, defended the investigation on Good Morning America.

"So I don't think, at least from what I can tell, there's no preferential treatment and certainly not at this office," Wolfinger said. "I don't see it."

BRINGING THE LIGHT

At a town hall meeting organized by the NAACP at Sanford's Allen Chapel AME Church in late March, men and women with signs calling for "Justice for Trayvon" filled nearly every pew. Children held up bags of Skittles and iced-tea -- items Martin carried from the store the night he was killed.

About 1,000 others rallied outside the church in the city's historic Goldsboro neighborhood, which until Sanford stripped it of its charter a century earlier, was the second all-black incorporated town in Florida.

Hundreds of others, mostly youth, broke off from the rally and marched up 13th Street to the police station to demand the chief's resignation.

Inside the church, residents came forward one by one with tales of pain they say they suffered at the hands of Sanford police. Their complaints filled page after page of a notebook kept by Ben Jealous, the president of the NAACP, who'd flown in to take part in the rallies and protests scheduled for the coming days.

People talked of sons and nephews who'd been beaten by police officers. One man said he was shot with a Taser for no good reason. A woman nearly came to tears as she talked of a son who she said was beaten by guards at the city jail last year, suffered a seizure and died in his cell. Others said that their loved ones had been killed and police investigations went nowhere.

Jealous said he'd turn his notebook over to the U.S. Justice Department, hoping the agency will review other cases that may have been given little scrutiny.

"I'll never forget. One man stood up and said, 'If you killed a dog in this town they will put you in jail tomorrow,'" Jealous recalled. "Trayvon Martin has been dead for more than four weeks and his killer is still walking around. I think that about says it all."

Jealous called Sanford a "deeply distressed" town with a police department that has shown "a pattern and practice of abuse and discrimination."

But he said the spotlight offers a moment of healing and hope.

"Right now, this moment means that parents who may not have gotten justice are more likely to get justice," Jealous said. "This moment means that a city called Sanford that was in deep crisis long before Trayvon Martin visited it, may finally get something approaching a real resolution to that crisis."

CORRECTION: A previous version of this article stated that Martin was shot and killed 70 feet from his father's girlfriend's back porch. The distance was yards.

Queens Machine Conspiracy


Memo to All Journalist:
In This Weekend of the Passing of Michael Wallace How Can You Call Yourself A Journalist and Allow A Lobbyist That Was Involved In pay to Play Bribery With The Board of Elections to Remain Anonymous. Was this Lobbyist a Campaign Consultant or A controller of A Political Party? New Yorker Need to Know. Do Your Job or Get Out and Let Someone Take It Who Believes in Democracy.




Queens Machine Conspiracy to Drive Rory Lancman Out of the Race to Elect Grace Meng to Congress

Former Brian Mclaughlin, Hevesi, David Weprin and Morton Povman staffer Jeff Gottlieb expected to enter the race for congress in the Meng district according to political consultant Jay Golub. Gottlieb will clearly split the Jewish vote with Lanman making county choice Grace Meng a walk in to win.
Breaking story more to come

Sunday, April 8, 2012

Divide and Conquer (Part One) [UPDATE: Conspirator Confesses] [And Insignificant Correction Added]

COLIN CAMPBELL (2/8/12): Earlier today, Liz Benjamin reported Councilman Erik Dilan is raising money for a federal office, suggesting his rumored campaign against Congresswoman Nydia Velázquez should be taken much more seriously. A Democratic source also told Chris Bragg that Mr. Dilan was close to making a decision.

But could Mr. Dilan win?

Ms. Velázquez, who’s a long-time political opponent of Brooklyn’s Democratic leader, Assemblyman Vito Lopez, would surely see the county’s Democratic organization support Mr. Dilan’s primary challenge should he pull the trigger. Having establishment support for a low-turnout primary battle would be a powerful tool for Mr. Dilan to have in his back pocket.

On the other hand, Ms. Velázquez is a pillar in parts of New York City’s Puerto Rican community and taking out a veteran incumbent is never an easy task.

A Democratic operative supporting Mr. Dilan told The Politicker he believes there could be a viable path to victory in this diverse district.

“I think the Dilans and Lopez believe that, in a Democratic primary, the Satmars, public housing population, and Asians, along with splitting the Latino vote with Nydia, could prove to be a path to victory for Erik,” he said, referencing Mr. Lopez’s strength in one of Williamsburg’s Hasidic sects, as well as both Mr. Dilan’s and Mr. Lopez’s influence in public housing. Both chair powerful public housing committees in their respective legislative bodies.

However, others have questioned whether Mr. Dilan truly intends to run, or if he even has a way to win in a district that includes many voters far outside of Mr. Dilan’s base in northern Brooklyn, including Manhattan’s Chinatown, parts of Brownstone Brooklyn, Poles in Greenpoint, and trendy gentrifying areas in the Lower East Side and Brooklyn.

For example, when rumors last surfaced that Mr. Dilan was considering a Congressional campaign, Brooklyn political blogger Gatemouth expressed doubts over Mr. Dilan’s “ability to battle Nydia Velazquez … in a district currently filled with substantial loads of yuppies, hipsters, white ethnics and Chinese.”

A Democratic official supporting Ms. Velázquez agreed, arguing while the district is plurality-Latino, “the majority of your primary date voters are white people … he would be introducing himself to basically a new electorate for him, comprised of people who have never voted for him or know who he is.”

OK; you’re Erik Dilan. You bring to the table a proven electoral base of your own, your father’s, and your political benefactor Vito Lopez’s to the table.

You add to that the dominant Zali faction of the Williamsburg Satmar Hasidic Community (and its allies among the Pupa and other smaller sects), the social services tentacles of the Brooklyn based Lopez empire which extend as well into the district’s small Queens area, the proven ability of Lopez (and yourself) to use your Housing Committee Chairmanships to leverage voters outside your base area and the little noticed addition of Shelly Silver’s home area of Grand Street to the mix.

You still lose.

Nydia has her own voters in the Dilan/Lopez home base areas.

Further, outside of the projects, where you might make inroads, Nydia Velazquez kicks your ass in Manhattan Chinatown and among Manhattan blacks and Latinos. She kicks your ass in Sunset Park and Red Hook (especially outside Red Hook Houses) among Latinos, Chinese and whites. She beats you among white voters, whether they be hipsters or Wall Streeters.

Your ability to penetrate these areas is limited and so is your time. You are not all that articulate, and even if you were, you have little to say to these people.

Dilan’s stump speech which calls for balanced budgets, while promising to protect Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security, could have come out of the mouth of Bob Turner.

There are few voters in the 7th CD who find that sort of politics appealing. And even those voters who might agree with this stuff, like the guys on the Board of the Stock Exchange living in mansions on Columbia Heights with two car garages (who enroll as Democrats because of social issues or to have the ability to participate in primaries), don’t want to be represented by someone who talks like Erik Dilan.

What to do?

You can’t access these votes. But maybe someone else can.

Enter Dan O’Connor and George Martinez.

Today we look at Dan O’Connor.

Dan O’Connor speaks fluent Mandarin and Cantonese and seems focused on draining Velazquez’s votes in the Chinese community, where he has business ties. He’s opened a headquarters in Chinatown and has gotten extensive play in the Chinese press.

Beyond that, O’Connor may take some of the fiscally conservative, socially liberal votes among Yuppies and Wall Streeters in places like the Heights, as well as among the more libertarian hipsters..

O’Connor is frightfully libertarian.

“ America is currently in the largest debt of any nation in the history of the world. Dan O’Connor will go to Washington DC and take an axe to all of the reckless spending that has been going on for so many years so that we do not pass this massive debt on to our children and future generations.

Republicans and Democrats have both been unreliable in their stated efforts to lower taxes and lower the debt. Both Obama and Bush Administrations have failed in their efforts to reduce the debt and spending.

Lowering taxes certainly benefits all of us. It gives working men and women the ability to take control of their own lives. It allows business owners to invest in their companies, pay their employees, and create new jobs. Lower taxes encourages spending, saving, and investing – all necessary for a healthy economy.

With our national debt approaching 16 trillion dollars, the deficit spending by Washington DC continues to mortgage fruits of our future labor to fund federal programs we don’t need and cannot afford.

We need representatives committed to cutting spending, balancing the budget, lowering taxes, and staying loyal to the The U.S. Constitution.”

O’Connor might even have some appeal among the some of the somewhat conservative old-timers left in places like Carroll Gardens.

Which brings me to why this most unlikely candidate for being a Vito Lopez plant might just be one (though I suspect, without his own personal knowledge).

As I’ve previously noted, Carroll Gardens’ Buddy Scotto Real Estate Industrial Complex is allied with Vito Lopez in trying to elect Buddy’s daughter, Debra, as the local Democratic District Leader against “reform” incumbent Jo Anne Simon. Moreover, the Scotto claque hates their former friend, Nydia Velazquez, who they consider “a radical environmentalist.”

But the Scotto claque, while wanting to help Dilan, finds little political advantage in openly supporting him.

But, a pleasant, white-skinned, anti-regulation tax cutter might appeal to them and their base on several different levels.

And, sure enough Buddy Scotto serves on Dan O’Connor’s Advisory Board:

“Salvatore “Buddy” Scotto
Salvatore Scotto, nicknamed “Buddy,” is a resident of Carroll Gardens and a staple of the community. His family first came to Brooklyn with a wave of Italian Immigrants and built up a number of successful businesses. He has a strong desire to provide people with residential housing that is both affordable and friendly. He believes in the strong message Dan O’Connor is putting forth and looks forward to helping his campaign.”

O’Connor’s eclectic base also includes “the Nappies” (the knick name is derived from the acronym for the Nappies’ former name, The New Alliance Party).

O’Connor’s Campaign Counsel is none other than Nappie lawyer Gary Sinawski.

As Tom Robbins once noted in the Village Voice, "There would be this little circle grouped around [Nappie Leader Fred] Newman, hanging on his every word… The group included Cathy Stewart, the chairwoman of the New York County Independence Party; attorneys Harry Kresky and Gary Sinawski; political consultant Jackie Salit; All Stars president Gabrielle Kurlander; and [Lenora] Fulani.”

Sinawski and the Nappies are experts on getting fringe candidates on the ballot.

For those who need a reminder, the Nappies are a crazed psychotic cult, which used to be associated with Lyndon LaRouche, but then spun off on its own. Their leader, Fred Newman, is a guru who calls himself a ‘Doctor of Psychology,’ and proudly admits to sleeping with his patients, who he also uses as political canvassers and working as slaves in his numerous prosperous business operations. Fronting for him is Fulani, a black woman, who also calls herself a ‘Doctor’, and who says ‘The Jews’, not Israelis, mind you, but ‘The Jews’function as mass murderers of people of color.”

While they rail against capitalism, the Nappies love making money. They have printers, and political consulting firms, and psychotherapy, and a theater, where they stage plays about ‘The Jews’ committing genocide against people of color.

The Nappies have, over the years, maintained associations with all sorts of armed and dangerous left-revolutionary types, but despite their left wing, and sometimes racialist-based, rhetoric, it’s hard to discern a unifying philosophical thread in a bunch that has flailed between Ross Perot, Al Sharpton, Pat Buchanan, the Natural Law Party and Ralph Nader (although hostility to Israel seem a common theme), but a few minutes watching Fred Newman speak tells you he isn’t making it up as he’s going along; there really is a scary underlying worldview. Plus, what, but true belief in one’s principles, could keep these folks from shutting up about the Jews?

But one can understand why a libertarian is a natural match for a party which has supported Perot, Sharpton, Buchanan, the Natural Law Party and Nader.

But there is a practical side to the Nappies. Back when they controlled the Independence Party, they sold the Party line in exchange for government contracts.

Fulani-Newman support for George Pataki and Mike Bloomberg yielded State and City financial backing in the millions for their “All-Stars” program, including mortgage financing via tax free municipal bonds, as well as funding for anti-Semitic theatrical productions, and most shockingly, school based “social therapy” programs run according to the Newman philosophy, which combines extreme left wing ideas with wacko psychiatric theories. As I’ve noted, “Social Therapist” Newman believes that it’s all right to have sex with his patients, and also to assign them therapeutic political work.

While, in a political context, Newman’s quotes concerning his view of "professional ethics" are probably among his least offensive comments, the fact that he was being given access to young children shocks the conscience, even if everybody kept their pants on. And we haven’t even mentioned the large private contributions given or leveraged by the Mayor to the “arts” programs. The Mayor has also appointed Fulani-Newman cultists as members of the City’s Charter Review Commission.

As I’ve documented, Mike Bloomberg plied Newman and Fulani with million dollar bribes and made multiple pilgrimages to their dens of iniquity, even appearing at a pre-election rally where he actually joined in a standing ovation for hate-queen Fulani.

I note this because, this would not be the first time the Nappies aided members of the political establishment, including Vito Lopez, in a common effort to beat Nydia Velazquez.

In 1992, Congressman Stephen Solarz saw his district decimated in reapportionment, and decided his best shot was to run in a newly created Latino district he did not live in and only represented only a tiny piece of.

There were two real Latino candidates, one of whom was Velazquez.

But three candidates with no shot helped divide the Latino vote further, and nearly elected Solarz.

One was Dr. Rafael Mendez, a Nappie, whose ballot access operation was run by Gary Sinawski and Harry Kresky.

Another was Ruben Franco, run by Vito Lopez.

Is this race déjà vu all over again?

Next time, we examine, the extensive regular Democratic connections of self proclaimed Wall Street Occupying Hip Hop candidate George Martinez.

UPDATE: CHRIS BRAGG says "GATEMOUTH NAILS IT!" He even gets a full confession from Buddy Scotto, who is caught en flagrante delicto with Dan.

INSIGNIFICANT CORRECTION:

Jerry Skurnik: You should change the tense in your comments on [Nappie Guru and cult leader] Fred Newman as he died a few months ago.

Gate: Really...I hope he suffered.

Gate sincerely apologies for all the people I scared and scarred by spreading the lie that Newman still dwelt amongst us.