Sunday, April 19, 2009

Hugo Chavez offers Spanish-language book as gift for President Obama

Updated Saturday, April 18th 2009, 5:32 PM

Vucci/AP

Venezuela's President Hugo Chavez hands President Barack Obama book, 'The Open Veins of Latin America,' by Uruguayan writer Eduardo Galeano.

Hugo Chavez once famously dumped on President Obama's predecessor as "the devil," but Saturday, the Venezuelan strongman came bearing gifts for the new guy in the White House.

Chavez presented Obama with a copy of a book called "The Open Veins of Latin America: Five Centuries of the Pillage of a Continent" as the two presidents made the rounds of the annual Summit of the Americas in Trinidad and Tobago.

The book is a famed Uruguayan journalist's treatise on foreign exploitation of the region.

Chavez said he signed it, "For Obama, with warm regards."

"It's an extraordinary book that helped me understand Latin America when I was young, our history, our reality," said Chavez, who apparently gave Obama a copy of the book in Spanish - a language he doesn't speak.

It wasn't clear whether Obama would delve into the tome soon, if at all.

"I thought it was one of Chavez's books. I was going to give him one of mine," Obama said.

U.S.-Venezuelan relations have been strained in recent times and hit an all-time low when Chavez famously compared George W. Bush to Satan in a speech at the United Nations. He recently called Obama a "poor ignoramus."

While Obama has clearly been chummier with Chavez, economic adviser Larry Summers cautioned reporters against making too much of these early overtures.

"Relationships depend on more than smiles and handshakes," Summers said.

Personalities aside, Obama made his way through the summit arguing for better relations with nations to the south, while at the same time urging those governments not to overblame the U.S. for their problems.

"I have a lot to learn and I very much look forward to listening and figuring out how we can work together more effectively," Obama said.

The President also got an earful about one nation that wasn't even present at the summit: Cuba, which was barred because of its undemocratic system of government.

During a morning meeting with a dozen South American leaders, Obama fielded repeated urgings to lift the U.S. ban on trade with the Communist-run island nation.

Obama has already lifted restrictions on Americans' ability to visit relatives in Cuba and send them money, and has said he is hoping for the Cuban government to ease repressive laws.

ckatz@nydailynews.com

Saturday, April 18, 2009

President Obama meets Hugo Chavez, and opens door to change in Cuba policy with Raul Castro

Updated Friday, April 17th 2009, 9:35 PM

Getty

President Barack Obama met Venezuelan leader Hugo Chavez for the first time at the Summit of the Americas.

WASHINGTON - President Obama made nice with the dictators next-door Friday, signalling to Raul Castro that he will consider lifting the U.S. embargo on Cuba, and warmly greeting Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez.

"I am prepared to have my administration engage with the Cuban government on a wide range of issues from human rights, free speech and democratic reform to drugs, migration and economic issues," Obama said at the Summit of the Americas in Trinidad and Tobago.

Obama, who has called for "recasting" the relationship, lifted curbs on Cuban-Americans' travel and money remittances to Cuba earlier this week.

Although he was not specific about when or where talks with the Cuban regime might start, he said he hopes to "move U.S.-Cuban relations in a new direction."

Earlier, responding to an appeal from "Juan in Cuba" at a town-hall type meeting in the Dominican Republic, Secretary of State Clinton also pressed for an opening to Havana, saying the U.S. embargo policy had "failed" in the 50-year standoff with the Communist Castro brothers.

Raul Castro, who took over as Cuban president from his ailing brother Fidel last year, said in Venezuela Friday, "We are open, whenever they want, to discussing everything - human rights, freedom of the press, political prisoners, everything, everything, everything they want to discuss."

Clinton called Castro's surprise statement "a very welcome overture."

"We are continuing to look for more productive ways forward in dealing with Cuba," Clinton said, "because President Obama and I and the administration view the present policy toward Cuba as having failed."

At the summit, Obama met Chavez for the first time, shaking hands and smiling with the socialist leader in a photo later released by the Venezuelan government.

Chavez said the introduction was initiated by the President, and that he told Obama he hopes to improve relations between the two nations.

rsisk@nydailynews.com

Friday, April 17, 2009

Former state Liberal Party boss' downfall

http://assets.nydailynews.com/img/2009/04/16/amd_ray_harding.jpg Ray Harding

This image of a once-potent player brought low startled New York's electoral world this week as Harding became the latest figure charged in the "pay-to-play" pension cases brought by state Attorney General Andrew Cuomo.

Cuomo charges that Harding was rewarded for years of political service to former Democratic Comptroller Alan Hevesi with hundreds of thousands of dollars in "placement" fees from investment firms seeking business from the state pension fund that Hevesi controlled.
Rudy Giuliani - whose mayoralty had been Harding's best known political meal ticket - gave a brief reaction as he departed a state GOP dinner on Wednesday. He said he didn't know the merits of the allegations and urged a prayer for Harding's family. Harding's lawyers deny the charges.

Dan Janison Dan Janison Recent columns

But what political insiders found more stunning was that years before Harding emerged as Giuliani's top political guru, he was a sometime-ally of former Gov. Mario Cuomo - and his son and adviser Andrew Cuomo.

Their on-and-off contacts of the past drive all kinds of armchair speculation over who's doing what to whom. "It's like a le Carré novel," a longtime acquaintance of all the players involved said sadly Thursday. "Unfortunately, I know the characters - and it's not a novel."

As it happened, it was in the Sheraton New York - the same hotel where on Wednesday he heard Republican icon Newt Gingrich encourage him to run for governor - that Giuliani stood up at Harding's Liberal Party dinner, with Gov. Cuomo, their clasped hands held high, 14 years ago.

"Governor Cuomo and Mayor Giuliani, I'm really happy to see you here tonight - together," Harding said.

The audience cheered. Days later, Republican George Pataki unseated Cuomo.

Despite that outcome, Harding, who ultimately won out in the party's factional warfare of the 1980s, seemed to thrive. His city-based law firm grew in stature. Associates enjoyed access to city agencies. Liberal Party members and Harding relatives got big and small city jobs.

But things fell apart. In 2001, Ray Harding backed Hevesi as Giuliani's successor for mayor. This was supposed to help position the then-city comptroller in the Democratic primary. Hevesi lost the primary, but it was too late to remove his name from the general-election ballot. He drew the Liberals a pathetic 1 percent of votes cast.

The following year, as Hevesi ran successfully for state comptroller, Harding also backed Andrew Cuomo for governor. But Cuomo by Election Day had ceded the Democratic primary to H. Carl McCall, so his draw on the Liberal line fell short of the 50,000 needed to sustain its automatic place on the ballot.

For Harding, the party was over in more ways than one. His son Russell was convicted of embezzlement and possessing child pornography and was sentenced to federal prison. The elder Harding allegedly pursued investment-placement fees to defray Russell's legal costs - leading him to hook up with Nassau-raised Hank Morris, a longtime Hevesi adviser and fellow "pay-to-play" defendant, who allegedly manipulated access for investment officials.

Prosecutors said Harding helped Hevesi arrange the vacancy of a Queens Assembly seat occupied by Democrat Michael Cohen for his son Andrew Hevesi. Cohen reportedly got a $150,000 job with the Health Insurance Plan of New York, and Andrew Hevesi, who is not charged with wrongdoing, got a quick special election that he won.

Many wonder whether these criminal cases will stick. For the moment, only their status as a political bombshell has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

Former state Liberal Party boss' downfall

Authorities placed Ray Harding, 74, ex-boss of the now-defunct state Liberal Party, in a double-set of handcuffs before walking him past the cameras to his arraignment.

This image of a once-potent player brought low startled New York's electoral world this week as Harding became the latest figure charged in the "pay-to-play" pension cases brought by state Attorney General Andrew Cuomo.

Cuomo charges that Harding was rewarded for years of political service to former Democratic Comptroller Alan Hevesi with hundreds of thousands of dollars in "placement" fees from investment firms seeking business from the state pension fund that Hevesi controlled.

Rudy Giuliani - whose mayoralty had been Harding's best known political meal ticket - gave a brief reaction as he departed a state GOP dinner on Wednesday. He said he didn't know the merits of the allegations and urged a prayer for Harding's family. Harding's lawyers deny the charges.

Dan Janison Dan Janison Recent columns

But what political insiders found more stunning was that years before Harding emerged as Giuliani's top political guru, he was a sometime-ally of former Gov. Mario Cuomo - and his son and adviser Andrew Cuomo.

Their on-and-off contacts of the past drive all kinds of armchair speculation over who's doing what to whom. "It's like a le Carré novel," a longtime acquaintance of all the players involved said sadly Thursday. "Unfortunately, I know the characters - and it's not a novel."

As it happened, it was in the Sheraton New York - the same hotel where on Wednesday he heard Republican icon Newt Gingrich encourage him to run for governor - that Giuliani stood up at Harding's Liberal Party dinner, with Gov. Cuomo, their clasped hands held high, 14 years ago.

"Governor Cuomo and Mayor Giuliani, I'm really happy to see you here tonight - together," Harding said.

The audience cheered. Days later, Republican George Pataki unseated Cuomo.

Despite that outcome, Harding, who ultimately won out in the party's factional warfare of the 1980s, seemed to thrive. His city-based law firm grew in stature. Associates enjoyed access to city agencies. Liberal Party members and Harding relatives got big and small city jobs.

But things fell apart. In 2001, Ray Harding backed Hevesi as Giuliani's successor for mayor. This was supposed to help position the then-city comptroller in the Democratic primary. Hevesi lost the primary, but it was too late to remove his name from the general-election ballot. He drew the Liberals a pathetic 1 percent of votes cast.

The following year, as Hevesi ran successfully for state comptroller, Harding also backed Andrew Cuomo for governor. But Cuomo by Election Day had ceded the Democratic primary to H. Carl McCall, so his draw on the Liberal line fell short of the 50,000 needed to sustain its automatic place on the ballot.

For Harding, the party was over in more ways than one. His son Russell was convicted of embezzlement and possessing child pornography and was sentenced to federal prison. The elder Harding allegedly pursued investment-placement fees to defray Russell's legal costs - leading him to hook up with Nassau-raised Hank Morris, a longtime Hevesi adviser and fellow "pay-to-play" defendant, who allegedly manipulated access for investment officials.

Prosecutors said Harding helped Hevesi arrange the vacancy of a Queens Assembly seat occupied by Democrat Michael Cohen for his son Andrew Hevesi. Cohen reportedly got a $150,000 job with the Health Insurance Plan of New York, and Andrew Hevesi, who is not charged with wrongdoing, got a quick special election that he won.

Many wonder whether these criminal cases will stick. For the moment, only their status as a political bombshell has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

Thursday, April 16, 2009

SUSPECT ARRESTED IN DANA RISHPY CASE













15 de Abril del 2009 20:36 April 15 2009 20:36

OFDI could detain more involved in the case Rishpy


By Eric Gallindo

The case of the disappearance of missing Israeli tourist, Dana Rishpy was reactivated on April 14, 2009. Tulum resident, Flor Pastrana Flores was arrested and flown to Mexico City for interrogation, when she exited the Scotiabank. Flores is a friend of American suspect, Matthew Walshin. It is reported that she rented an apartment to him after Dana's disappearance in Tulum. Shortly afterwards, Walshin fled to the US and is still in hiding.

State prosecutor, Bello Melchor Rodríguez y Carrillo, said this could lead to more arrests in the coming days by the Deputy Attorney Specialized Investigation of Organized Crime (OFDI). After her arrest and transfer to Mexico City, Pastrana Flores, will be interrogated by personnel of OFDI about the disappearance of the Israeli citizen, Dana Rishpy.

Counsel for the agency said that the file regarding Rishpy's disappearance remains open. Officials did not want to go into detail and did not reveal why some people could be on the next list of detainees in this case by the federal authorities. They said the PGJE sought cooperation of various courts, as well as other states
Dana Rishpy, disappeared in 2007. (SIPSE) (SIPS)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YFP Commentary:

The arrest of Flor Pastrana Flores is a step in the right direction. She has long been considered
to hold valuable information in regards to the case. As a loyal friend of suspect Matthew Walshin
for more than fifteen years, she protected him after Dana's disappearance. The web of lies and alibis is vast. Zsolt Fejer, a.k.a., "El Hungaro", still remains in jail on the charge of drug sales.
He too was a friend of Walshin's in Tulum. However, he has given little information.

In spite of the "Tulum Wall of Silence", the pressure has been stepped up. A Houston, Texas newspaper has interviewed the Rishpy family and WABC TV (http://www.7online.com/) conducted a major interview with Dana's parents. So, for those who thought that they have escaped scrutiny, beware. The eyes of the world are upon you.

Rudy set to greet GOP as another old pal is busted

By Dan Janison

scharding0416.jpg

Talk about unlucky timing. Wednesday night, the state Republicans gather at the Sheraton in midtown Manhattan and one of the featured guests on the program is former Mayor Rudy Giuliani, once again touted as a possible solution to Republican doldrums with brewing speculation of a gubernatorial run next year.

And what is the New York political news of the day? His close longtime adviser Ray Harding, who headed the now-defunct state Liberal Party, is charged in conjunction with the pay-to-play mess surrounding investment actions taken while Alan Hevesi was state comptroller.

UPDATE: The AP reports reports that it involves more than $800,000 in illegal fees linked to state pension fund investments, purportedly as a reward for helping Hevesi's son Andrew get a seat in the state Assembly.....Read full story.

Even though Giuliani fell out with Hevesi toward the end of their eight years of simultaneous incumbency, Harding remained an ally of the one-time Queens Democratic figure.

Harding's son Russell, of course, served time due to crimes committed as head of Giuliani's housing corporation. Hank Morris, charged in the investment probe by AG Andrew Cuomo and the Securities Exchange Commission, was politically allied with Ray Harding. Former LP executive director Fran Reiter served as a Rudy deputy mayor -- as did Harding's repected son Robert.

Along with Bernard Kerik, this adds one more Giuliani pal facing prosecution, potentially during the rollout of his next campaign. Of course, it may not necessarily matter. Does anyone talk about Tony Resko any more?

The time-honored pre-emptive move to get word out before the authorities is here.

Tom Robbins' cutting-edge story on Hank Morris and Harding is here.

Rudy Giuliani, left, with Raymond Harding, ex-chief of the now defunct Liberal Party, take in a Yankees-Rangers game on opening day April 12, 2000. (AP Photo)

Wednesday, April 15, 2009

Who will pay the price?

By Ariel Fernandez Diaz, El Diario La Prensa
See full size image

We know that, historically, the everyday citizen ends up paying the price for political games. That is why the recent attempts by the Obama administration to eliminate restrictions on travel and remittances to Cuba for Cubans living in the United States, as well as the possibility that all U.S. citizens could freely visit the island, have been favorably received by the residents of both countries.

The dispute between Cuba and the United States has had a severe impact on the lives of millions of Cubans and Americans for almost half a century, isolating us through policies that make no sense. The American blockade of the island has not affected the Cuban political hierarchy and their immediate families whatsoever. Those who determine this country's policies have not been affected either.

The blockade punishes and affects the Cuban people unjustly. As a foreign policy, it does not contain solid arguments. To put it simply, as much as it may hurt to hear it, it has failed.

Whatever the battle is against the Castro brothers and Communist ideology, those who are not responsible should not be blamed.

The embargo against Cuba is and has been an agenda maintained by hate, rancor, inertia, and ego. It lacks ideological pragmatism and political effectiveness. It contradicts the democratic values that the United States promotes globally, and it affects and ironically limits the citizens of the "free world."

Cuba and its people have not done more damage to the United States than Vietnam, Japan, or any other country with which the United States has had a military conflict and has normal diplomatic relations today.

Why then do we isolate Cuba exclusively? This is the $100 million question to which no one has a concrete answer.

If the U.S. government really wants change on the island, it cannot be promoted through sanctions and blockades.

To promote change, a new political ethic must be constructed, a new discourse of dialogue and negotiation. Nothing will help and affect the Cuban people more than social and cultural exchange with regular American citizens.

Nothing will bring democracy to Cuban society or show Americans the "real" Cuba more than this interaction. Both governments know this and greatly fear the possible impact this would have. As much as the word "change" has been used here and on the island, the governments are not prepared for it.

While the people in power continue to discuss the elimination of the restrictions, if they do not address the root problem and instead seek to regulate the matter, there will be an enormous impact on Cuban immigrants like myself. It is the right of all human beings and the goal of every immigrant in this country to be able to visit our families once a year, send them remittances and support them spiritually and economically. No one and nothing can deprive us of that.

Tuesday, April 14, 2009

Campaign Consultant Lobbyists Cause Corruption

Tuesday, April 14, 2009

Nobody Asked Me, But
Modern Day Robber Barons
By Gary Tilzer


Why is the Post the only paper still going after the council's UFT puppet act last week? Yesterday's story How the UFT owns the Council. Today's Post editorial HOW TO BUY A CITY COUNCIL which pointed out that 30 in-house UFT lobbyists are assigned to bird-dog lawmakers. . . The Times which has yet to write anything about Puppetgate had a corruption story today about lobbyists, but talked mostly about how Bush 41's Carlyle Group made money on the pension kick-back pay-to-play operation, that former controller Hevesi's campaign consultant Hank Morris is under indictment for: N.Y. Pension Deals Seen as Focus of Wide Inquiry . . . You would think that this indictment alone would ignite a series of media investigations about campaign consultants, yet not a word has been said. It gets worse. Every candidate running for City Controller this year has hired campaign consultants who also are lobbyists, or have developed other ways of making money off of those they elect, such as Morris stands accused of doing. . . By the way, what is about happen to the council investigation that tax payers are still paying the legal bills for? That involved consultants also A Letter to Garcia: (Michael) Garcia U.S. Attorney The Daily Gotham - we were told months ago that the Times was working on a big series on member items and the council's abuse. Perhaps they are waiting until after the council elections this year.

These modern day campaign consultants are truly today's Robber Barons, untouchable by the media which they constantly feed with tips on stories. Even a recent Daily News series about Albany's dysfunction did not talk about campaign consultants who also work as lobbyists. It's funny that we have all these campaign finance rules to prevent pay-to-play and yet the very people who are running the campaign are untouched by any these checks and balances. They are like old time Robber Barons: above the law. Many of them work together as sub contractors for each other and see all pols as interchangeable puppets to make money off of: Lobbyist predicts to clients Gov. will step aside. . .

Today's Times column by Haberman Mayor Gets the G.O.P. to Let Him In, talks about the Republican leader in the Bronx who delivered the vote Bloomberg needed to get the GOP line, but failed to say who Joseph J. Savino leads. There are no GOP elected officials in the Bronx. The Bronx, much larger than SI, has the smallest amount of registered republicans in the city. He does have jobs to offer at the Board of Elections: Cheap politics. This is what the mayor thinks of the BOE: NYC Board of Elections: Bloomberg's allegation Against Board of ... More about the county leader Tammany Hall-type control of ballot access for minor parties in the city: Tammany’s Ballot Control Again and Again.

We always knew that dysfunctional Albany was full of something. Today's Daily News editorial makes it clear to all just what they are full of Flushing your money away: State wastes big bucks on pols' bathrooms while closing beaches. We think that Albany should not have scaled back the state parks for spending on their new bathrooms.

Senator Dilan Reminds Homeowners While Weather is Warm, Catch Up on Home Heating Assistance

See full size image

(Brooklyn, NY)—Although the worst of winter weather may be out of sight, Senator Martin Malavé Dilan (D-Brooklyn) is reminding constituents that state energy assistance shouldn’t be out of mind.

Emergency action was taken earlier this year, by way of federal Home Energy Assistance Program funding, that increased the amount and accessibility to home heating assistance in New York. The increase offset drastic home heating costs coupled with severe winter weather.

“Despite the warming weather, it’s important that new homeowners and past beneficiaries of HEAP assistance know that there were changes made to the program this year,” said Senator Dilan.

Under the plan a family of four with a household income up to $56,635, up from $45,312, became eligible for the emergency assistance. A $100 supplemental HEAP benefit was also made available to homes enrolled in the plan, increasing that benefit from $800 to $900.

“It’s important to have a plan in place for next winter,” said Senator Dilan. “Any chance that homes and families, that had not met the assistance requirements in the past will next year, is worth looking into. Don’t let high home heating costs take their toll in the dead of winter.”

To learn more about HEAP and your eligibility please visit www.myBenefits.ny.gov.


Contact: Graham Parker | gparker@senate.state.ny.us | (518) 455-2874

Court Declares Franken Winner; Coleman to Appeal

by: Pat Doyle | Visit article original @ Minneapolis Star Tribune

Al Franken.

A three-judge panel in Minnesota has declared Al Franken the winner of the contested US Senate race there. Norm Coleman is expected to appeal. (Photo: AP)

Three judges soundly rejected Norm Coleman's attempt to reverse Al Franken's lead in the U.S. Senate election late Monday, sweeping away the Republican's claims in a blunt ruling Coleman promised to appeal.

After a trial spanning nearly three months, the judicial panel dismissed Coleman's central argument that the election and its aftermath were fraught with systemic errors that made the results invalid.

"The overwhelming weight of the evidence indicates that the Nov. 4, 2008, election was conducted fairly, impartially and accurately," the panel said in its unanimous decision.

The panel concluded that Franken, a DFLer, "received the highest number of votes legally cast" in the election. Franken emerged from the trial with a 312-vote lead, the court ruled, and "is therefore entitled to receive the certificate of election."

Speaking to reporters outside his downtown Minneapolis condominium, Franken, flanked by his wife, Franni, said he had "no control" over what Coleman does next but said he would urge his opponent not to appeal, which would delay his certification. "I am honored and humbled by this close victory," he said. "And it's long past time we got to work."

In an interview earlier in the day, Coleman said he believes "thousands" of rejected votes should have been counted.

Coleman legal spokesman Ben Ginsberg said the ruling denies many valid votes by applying a stricter standard to determining eligible ballots than local officials applied during the recount.

"This order ignores the reality of what happened in the counties and cities on Election Day in terms of counting the votes," Ginsberg said, asserting that Coleman must appeal to assure that valid votes are counted. Coleman's lawyers have 10 days to file an appeal with the Minnesota Supreme Court.

But experts who read the panel's 68-page ruling say it effectively attacks some of the very arguments that Coleman would use on appeal.

"It is the kind of opinion that is unlikely to be disturbed on appeal by either the Minnesota Supreme Court or the United States Supreme Court," said Richard Hasen, an expert on election law at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles. "The opinion considers the major arguments made by Coleman and rejects them in a detailed and measured way."

Added University of Minnesota political scientist Lawrence Jacobs: "This is judicial speak for 'nothing here,' and it is most definitely aimed at the appeals process. It's a signal that they are supremely unimpressed by the Coleman case."

The office of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada released a statement Monday night praising the judges' decision but signaling that he would not move to seat Franken in advance of Coleman's expected appeal:

"Norm Coleman is entitled to appeal to the Minnesota Supreme Court. If he does so, we look forward to a prompt decision from that court so that Gov. Pawlenty can issue an election certificate and we can finally bring an end to an episode that has left the people of Minnesota without full representation for too long and has cost taxpayers too much money."

Blunt Rejection

The judges said Coleman, trailing Franken by 225-votes after the recount, wanted the panel to ignore Minnesota election law and adopt a more lenient standard allowing illegal absentee ballots to be counted.

The panel was blunt in how it dismissed Coleman claims. A cornerstone of his case was the argument that the judges should count absentee ballots they had deemed illegal during the trial because similar ones had been accepted on Election Day and during the recount.

The panel wrote that Coleman's position would "lead to an absurd result. Following [Coleman's] argument to its conclusion, the court would be compelled to conclude that if one county mistakenly allowed felons to vote, then all counties would have to count the votes of felons."

Moreover, the panel said that Coleman failed to show that "alleged errors or irregularities regarding the treatment of absentee ballots affected the outcome of the election."

The panel took aim at some Coleman claims that will likely figure in any appeal to the Minnesota Supreme Court or federal court system. One of those was his argument that widespread problems - including varying practices by counties in determining which votes to count - denied many people their right to vote.

"There is no evidence of a systemic problem of disenfranchisement in the state's election system, including in its absentee balloting procedures," the panel wrote.

Bitter Battle

The battle over rejected absentee ballots became the centerpiece of the trial because they provided the best chance for Coleman to find votes to overcome the lead that Franken held after the recount.

But that battle became bitter after the judges in February rejected Coleman's bid to count as many as 4,800 absentee ballots. The judges said Minnesota law made absentee voting a privilege and set strict eligibility standards for absentee voting to avoid fraud.

After that ruling, Coleman's lawyers shifted gears and began to attack the legal reasoning of the panel and the practices of state and local elections officials.

The judges in their ruling confronted those arguments head on, defending the integrity of the state's electoral system in the strongest terms at the very end of their ruling.

"The citizens of Minnesota should be proud of their election system," they wrote.

And the judges rejected Coleman claims that Franken netted about 100 votes in Minneapolis after some ballots disappeared and others were counted twice when local officials failed to keep track of damaged original ballots and their duplicates.

"The court did not hear testimony from any precinct election judge that they duplicated damaged ballots and failed to mark the duplicates or the originals," the judges wrote.

Regarding the missing ballots, they wrote: "The record contains no allegation or evidence of fraud or foul play with respect to the missing envelope of ballots." The judges said every indication is that the machine totals from the Minneapolis precinct were accurate.

Staff writers Kevin Duchschere, Mike Kaszuba, Patricia Lopez and Kevin Diaz contributed to this report.

Monday, April 13, 2009

The Bush Six to Be Indicted

by Scott Horton

Alberto Gonzales Spanish prosecutors will seek criminal charges against Alberto Gonzales and five high-ranking Bush administration officials for sanctioning torture at Guantanamo. By Scott Horton.

Spanish prosecutors have decided to press forward with a criminal investigation targeting former U.S. attorney general Alberto Gonzales and five top associates over their role in the torture of five Spanish citizens held at Guantánamo, several reliable sources close to the investigation have told The Daily Beast. Their decision is expected to be announced on Tuesday before the Spanish central criminal court, the Audencia Nacional, in Madrid. But the decision is likely to raise concerns with the human rights community on other points: they will seek to have the case referred to a different judge.

Both Washington and Madrid appear determined not to allow the pending criminal investigation to get in the way of improved relations.

The six defendants—in addition to Gonzales, Federal Appeals Court Judge and former Assistant Attorney General Jay Bybee, University of California law professor and former Deputy Assistant Attorney General John Yoo, former Defense Department general counsel and current Chevron lawyer William J. Haynes II, Vice President Cheney’s former chief of staff David Addington and former Under-Secretary of Defense Douglas J. Feith—are accused of having given the green light to the torture and mistreatment of prisoners held in U.S. detention in “the war on terror.” The case arises in the context of a pending proceeding before the court involving terrorism charges against five Spaniards formerly held at Guantánamo. A group of human rights lawyers originally filed a criminal complaint asking the court to look at the possibility of charges against the six American lawyers. Baltasar Garzón Real, the investigating judge, accepted the complaint and referred it to Spanish prosecutors for a view as to whether they would accept the case and press it forward. “The evidence provided was more than sufficient to justify a more comprehensive investigation,” one of the lawyers associated with the prosecution stated.

But prosecutors will also ask that Judge Garzón, an internationally known figure due to his management of the case against former Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet and other high profile cases, step aside. The case originally came to Garzón because he presided over efforts to bring terrorism charges against the five Spaniards previously held at Guantánamo. Spanish prosecutors consider it “awkward” for the same judge to have both the case against former U.S. officials based on the possible torture of the five Spaniards at Guantanamo and the case against those very same Spaniards. A source close to the prosecution also noted that there was concern about the reaction to the case in some parts of the U.S. media, where it had been viewed, incorrectly, as a sort of personal frolic of Judge Garzón. Instead the prosecutors will ask Garzón to transfer the case to Judge Ismail Moreno, who is currently handling an investigation into kidnapping charges surrounding the CIA’s use of facilities as a safe harbor in connection with the seizure of Khalid el-Masri, a German greengrocer who was seized and held at various CIA blacksites for about half a year as a result of mistaken identity. The decision on the transfer will be up to Judge Garzón in the first instance, and he is expected to make a quick ruling. If he denies the request, it may be appealed.

Judge Garzón’s name grabs headlines in Spain today less because of his involvement in the Gonzales torture case than because of his supervision of the Gürtel affair, in which leading figures of the conservative Partido Popular in Madrid and Valencia are now under investigation or indictment on suspicions of corruptly awarding public works contracts. Garzón is also the nation’s leading counterterrorism judge, responsible for hundreds of investigations targeting Basque terrorist groups, as well as a major recent effort to identify and root-out Al Qaeda affiliates operating in the Spanish enclaves of North Africa.

Announcement of the prosecutor’s decision was delayed until after the Easter holiday in order not to interfere with a series of meetings between President Barack Obama and Spanish Prime Minister José Zapatero. However, contrary to a claim contained in an editorial on April 8 in the Wall Street Journal, the Obama State Department has been in steady contact with the Spanish government about the case. Shortly after the case was filed on March 17, chief prosecutor Javier Zaragoza was invited to the U.S. embassy in Madrid to brief members of the embassy staff about the matter. A person in attendance at the meeting described the process as “correct and formal.” The Spanish prosecutors briefed the American diplomats on the status of the case, how it arose, the nature of the allegations raised against the former U.S. government officials. The Americans “were basically there just to collect information,” the source stated. The Spanish prosecutors advised the Americans that they would suspend their investigation if at any point the United States were to undertake an investigation of its own into these matters. They pressed to know whether any such investigation was pending. These inquiries met with no answer from the U.S. side.

Spanish officials are highly conscious of the political context of the case and have measured the Obama Administration’s low-keyed reaction attentively. Although Spain is a NATO ally that initially supported “the war on terror” under Bush with a commitment of troops in both Iraq and Afghanistan, relations with the Bush administration deteriorated after Zapatero became prime minister and acted quickly to withdraw the Spanish contingent in Iraq. In the 2008 presidential campaign, Republican John McCain referred to Spain as a hostile state in comments that mystified Spaniards (it appears that McCain may have confused Spain with Venezuela and Zapatero with Hugo Chávez). Recently, the United States and Spain also wrangled over Spain’s decision to withdraw its troop commitment in Kosovo as well. Both Zapatero and Obama, however, have given a high priority to improving relations between the two long-standing allies. Spanish newspapers hailed the fact that Obama referred to Zapatero three times as “my good friend” during the recent European summit meetings, a sharp contrast with meetings at which former President Bush gave Zapatero a cold shoulder.

Both Washington and Madrid appear determined not to allow the pending criminal investigation to get in the way of improved relations, which both desire, particularly in regards to coordinated economic policy to confront the current financial crisis and a reshaped NATO mandate for action in Afghanistan. With the case now proceeding, that will be more of a challenge. The reaction on American editorial pages is divided—some questioning sharply why the Obama administration is not conducting an investigation, which is implicitly the question raised by the Spanish prosecutors. Publications loyal to the Bush team argue that the Spanish investigation is an “intrusion” into American affairs, even when those affairs involve the torture of five Spaniards on Cuba.

The Bush Six labored at length to create a legal black hole in which they could implement their policies safe from the scrutiny of American courts and the American media. Perhaps they achieved much of their objective, but the law of unintended consequences has kicked in. If U.S. courts and prosecutors will not address the matter because of a lack of jurisdiction, foreign courts appear only too happy to step in.

Scott Horton is a law professor and writer on legal and national security affairs for Harper's Magazine and The American Lawyer, among other publications.

"Eliot Spitzer" Makes an appearance on Saturday Night Live.

Sunday, April 12, 2009

Bronx kids still waiting for new fields

Juan Gonzalez

Friday, April 10th 2009, 4:00 AM

The baseball season officially begins next week for All Hallows High School - a wonderful Bronx Catholic school in the shadows of the new $1.5 billion Yankee Stadium.

The varsity team's home opener will be against Iona Prep on Wednesday, but the game will not be played in the Bronx. It will not kick off a few blocks away at Babe Ruth field in Macombs Dam Park, where All Hallows played all its home games for so many decades.

Babe Ruth field is gone.

All Hallows, which opened its doors on E. 164th St. 80 years ago, and which every year graduates virtually all of its students and sends them on to college, is suffering through its third consecutive year of its sports teams being homeless. So are the track and soccer teams. So are teams at many other neighborhood schools.

Next week, All Hallows will "host" the visiting Iona team on Iona's field up in New Rochelle.

For this scandalous state of affairs, we can all thank the legendary Yankees organization and the Department of Parks.

Both have failed to address the problem they created for neighborhood kids when they grabbed 22 acres of public parkland to make way for the new stadium and its assorted parking garages.

If you go to the All Hallows Web site, you will find the letters "TBA" (to be announced) as the site for most baseball home games this spring.

Back in 2006, when the City Council approved the stadium plan, the Parks Department assured neighborhood residents that temporary alternate fields would be provided.

It said new replacement parks, including a new running track, would be built quickly, some to open as early as this summer. The Yankees even promised $800,000 a year for the community and its sports teams.

The past three years have been a nightmare for the school's sports programs to pin down sites for their home contests, Principal Sean Sullivan said.

"I can get an answer from the Pope in Rome faster than I can from the Parks Department," said Sullivan, who doubles as assistant baseball coach.

Only a few days ago, the Parks Department finally offered the baseball team a rundown field at Pelham Bay Park - a 40-minute trip to the other side of the Bronx.

"The field looks like a lunar landscape," Sullivan said. "When I'm standing in the third base coaching box, I can't see my shortstop completely because he's playing in a ditch."

To accomplish all this additional traveling for the varsity and JV teams, even for practices, the school has been forced to buy two small buses and order a third. The total cost, says school President Paul Krebbs, has been more than $100,000.

Friday, April 10, 2009

FUND RAISER ON THE THRONE


INVITATION FOR A FUND RAISING EVENT FOR THE UN-RE-ELECTION OF YOUR ROYAL HIGHNESS MICHAEL BLOOMBERG THE THIRD

Michael Bloombito not only betrayed the will of the people Of New York City when they voted twice on a referendum that elected officials will serve no more than two terms in office. Not only did your Royal Highness betray New Yorkers, but he betrayed himself.

Therefore, I invite all New Yorkers for a fund raiser to un-re-elect Bloombito

WHERE:

AT THE TOILET BOWL IN MY RESIDENCE WHERE YOU WILL BE ABLE TO SEE FIRST HAND YOUR “HONOR” GAZING INTO THE TOILET BOWEL. THIS IS WHAT HE THINKS OF THE CITIZENS OF OUR GREAT CITY.

OF COURSE, YOU MUST PAY . SEND YOU CONTRIBUTION TO OUR TRUSTED "DISTINGUISHED TREASURER", BERNARD MADOFF. C/O Metropolitan Correctional Center. HE HAS THE BLESSING OF BLOOMBITO.

LOOKING FORWARD TO SEEING YOU ALL AROUND THE TOILET BOWL.
(RSVP: Bernard Madoff)

Rafael Martínez Alequín

PESACH WITHOUT DANA RISHPY



Family says search will last ‘as long as it takes’
By LISE OLSEN HOUSTON CHRONICLE
April 9, 2009, 10:56PM

Billy Smith II Chronicle
Dror and Dania Rishpy hold a photo of their daughter, Dana, 24, who disappeared two years ago in Mexico.

An Israeli couple said Thursday they plan to stay in the Houston area for “as long as it takes” to find a family who may have information about their daughter, who disappeared two years ago in Playa del Carmen, Mexico.
Dania and Dror Rishpy, who have already traveled to Mexico and California, said they are hoping to find a family from Willowbrook who just might have been the last people to see their daughter, 24-year-old Dana, alive.

The couple is looking for a family who rescued a woman closely resembling their daughter, after finding a bikini-clad woman unconscious and covered with sand in a roadway in Playa Del Carmen, Mexico, in April 2007. The family took her to beachside restaurant called “La Ruina” and gave the woman ice and water but she never opened her eyes.
After three hours, Mexican police turned the unconscious woman over to a man who claimed to be her boyfriend, another tourist told the Rishpys.

“We don’t want anything from them, we just want to thank them for the help they gave to our daughter: They picked up our daughter from the road,” Dania Rishpy said Thursday.
The Rishpys, from Haifa Israel, decided to travel here after meeting in Mexico in March with that tourist, a Mexican who says she also was visiting Playa del Carmen in 2007. She told the Rishpys she saw a tall pale girl with waist-long curly brown hair.
The pair arrived here on Sunday and met with Harris County Sheriff’s Office and Israeli Consulate officials.

The Rishpys are looking for a family, including a mother, father, two daughters and two sons, whose cruise ship docked in Playa del Carmen, Mexico, on April 4 or 5, 2007. The children were in their teens or early 20s. The family’s youngest son was 14 or 15 in 2007 and may have Down syndrome. The family is believed to live in the Willowbrook area.
Anyone with information should call the Harris County Sheriff’s Office’s missing person line at 713-755-7427.
lise.olsen@chron.com

Wednesday, April 8, 2009

Bronx bakery battle: Workers at Stella D’oro Cookie Factory in the Bronx emerged as symbols of working-class resistance during a time of economic crisis

image preview

MOBILIZING MOM: Sara Rodriguez leads the charge on the Stella D'oro picket line. PHOTO: JOEL COOK.
When the 136 factory workers at the Stella D'oro Biscuit Co. in the Bronx went on strike Aug. 13, they didn't expect to be out on the street for long. Evelyn Rivera, who had only been at Stella D'oro since August 2007, recalls the reassurances she received from some of the factory's older hands. "Maybe five weeks," they told her.
The strike had been launched to protest, among other concessions, wage cuts of up to 26 percent demanded by Brynwood Partners, the private equity firm that purchased Stella D'oro from Kraft Foods, Inc. in 2006.
Declaring Brynwood's terms unacceptable, the workers set up a 24-hour picket line outside the factory gates at 237th Street and Broadway that, by their own account, better resembled a neighborhood party than a scene of dissent.
"We used to barbecue every night for the people," says Stella D'oro employee Mike Filippou.
But as weeks on the picket line turned into months, the Stella D'oro strikers began to realize that they had underestimated Brynwood's unyieldingness.
"In the summer, we didn't know better," Filippou concedes. "We wasted a lot of time."
The stakes abruptly became apparent when, a month into the strike, the bottom fell out of the U.S. economy and nationwide unemployment soared. As longtime Stella D'oro employee Emelia Dorsu puts it, "Right now you can't even find a job."
But far from cowed by the odds they face, after seven months on the picket line, the Stella D'oro strikers have mounted an energetic campaign that has been boosted by outside support. In the process, they have emerged as representatives of a larger struggle escalating between labor and management as the economy continues to spiral downward.
"[Business owners] are going to start to use the recession to take back wages and benefits, so I think people should resist," Filippou says. As he sees it, the Stella D'oro strikers "are making the beginning for other people to start resisting."
A new business model
As a workers' representative to the Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers, and Grain Millers (BCTGM) International Union Local 50, Mike Filippou had already been through two sets of contract negotiations when he and other union officials sat down with representatives from Brynwood in late May 2008 to negotiate a new contract for the Stella D'oro workers. He expected the meeting to follow the model of past negotiations: "You give me this, I give you that."
Instead, Fillipou says, "as soon as they get to the table, the company gives the union reps a big presentation about how bad the company is doing, how many millions they are losing. I was ready to cry."
A lawyer from Brynwood then rolled out a proposal that divided the Stella D'oro workforce into two camps, the skilled and the non-skilled. Among the skilled the company counted the factory's mechanics, electricians, foremen and mixers. Among the non-skilled were the sanitation workers and cookie packers, who comprise more than 60 percent of the workforce. While the wages of the skilled would remain intact, from the salary of the so-called non-skilled, Brynwood wanted to subtract one dollar from the hourly wage each year for the next five years. Under this plan, workers who earned $37,000 in 2007 would see their annual income drop to $27,000 by 2012.
Brynwood's other proposals, which extended to the entire Stella D'oro workforce, included the elimination of overtime pay and all sick days, plus the loss of one week of vacation and four holiday days. Brynwood also wanted employees to pay for 20 percent of the cost of a company healthcare plan, whereas before the employees had paid nothing for health benefits.
Moreover, says Joyce Alston, Local 50 president, Brynwood rewrote "anything [in the contract] that gave members a sense of protection," including work rules and conditions of employment. "They would have a grievance procedure but it wouldn't be effective because the contract was saying that the company could change your schedule, change your job at will," a condition that would leave the workers at the mercy of management. "You give that contract, you give your union," Filippou says.
According to Alston, the union requested a copy of Brynwood's financial records for an accountant to review in order to verify the company's claims. She says that Brynwood denied union reps a copy, informing them that they could access the financial records only at company headquarters, in Greenwich, Conn., where they would be allowed to sit and take notes.
Brynwood has not responded to repeated requests by The Indypendent for comment
Weeks of haggling followed. Once it became apparent that Brynwood would not budge on its central demands, Stella D'oro workers voted unanimously to strike.
In September, Local 50 filed an Unfair Labor Practice with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), the federal governmental agency charged with adjudicating labor disputes. As its central grievance Local 50 cited Brynwood's refusal to negotiate in good faith.
The company evidently recognized the value of some of its employees to the factory's operation. Filippou says that he and other "skilled" Stella D'oro workers were approached by management in the weeks prior to the strike.
"They were betting on the skilled workers throwing the rest beneath the tracks," Filippou says. Eddie Marrero, a Stella D'oro employee of 29 years, believes that Brynwood's assumption that it could divide the workforce reveals a fundamental difference between the private equity firm and the workers.
"Our position wasn't greed. Our position was respect," Marrero says.
Striking back
What both the strikers and Brynwood had supposed a quick and easy fight has evolved into a seven-month battle.
Shortly after the Stella D'oro workers walked out, Brynwood made its first move by hiring scores of strikebreakers.

Local 50 responded to Brynwood maneuvers with a call to boycott Stella D'oro "scab cookies."

image preview

PUSH BACK: Members of the Committee in Support of the Stella D'oro Strikers try to prevent strikebreakers from entering the Bronx-based factory March 11. PHOTO: JOEL COOK
Beyond the boycott, the union believed it had few options other than to wait for the NLRB ruling, which stood to prevent Brynwood from hiring strikebreakers as permanent replacement workers.
"The union is fighting the legal battle," says Local 50 President Alston. "Other than that, your hands are kind of tied." Since August, the Stella D'oro strikers have squeaked by on a weekly income of $105 from their union strike fund and an unemployment check, to which they are legally entitled due to Brynwood's hiring of strikebreakers. The strikers' unemployment benefits will expire this August.
The Stella D'oro workers entered their fifth month on the picket line with the realization that they could not rely upon a creeping legal process. This realization came to a head at the end of December when community members joined with strikers to organize a more energetic and aggressive counter-attack. The fruit of this collaboration has been the Committee in Support of the Stella D'oro Strikers.
Judy Sheridan-Gonzalez, a nurse and long-time member of the New York State Nurses Association, describes the Committee as a coalition of diverse individuals, many affiliated with other unions or various left-wing activist groups.
"Different people were doing different things to help [the strikers]," says Sheridan- Gonzalez. "Then some of us said, 'We need to do this together.'"
What began with one meeting at a McDonald's has now evolved into weekly meetings during which strikers and community members sit down together to hash out a strategy.
The support group produces and distributes fliers, calls press conferences, organizes rallies, raises money for the Local 50 strike fund, and reaches out to other unions and labor groups.
One of the Committee's campaigns aims to bring the Stella D'oro boycott to the attention of retailers by sending out teams to petition store managers to pull Stella D'oro products from the shelf.
According to Stella D'oro supporter Micah Landau, the strike committee has focused most of its energies of late on Fairway. Landau says the Committee is also targeting several larger grocery store chains including Stop & Shop and Food Emporium.
In this and other ways, strike support committees, which have not been prevalent since the 1930s, can sidestep the legal obstacles which so often stop more aggressive actions by unions and their members.
But not all Stella D'oro strikers have jumped on board. Indeed, far more strikers do not attend Committee meetings than do.
While Sheridan-Gonzalez cites a suspicion of outsiders as one factor contributing to low-involvement, striker Emelia Dorsu points to another reason.
"I think that when this first started, we thought it was just us. It was our problem and we have to solve it," Dorsu says. "I didn't know that there's a lot of support and solidarity out there. I didn't know that people care so much about other people. I didn't. Until I started getting involved and going out."
On March 5, Dorsu and the rest of the Stella D'oro strikers took a break from the picket line and headed to City Hall in order to participate in a giant rally organized by a number of New York City union locals to protest state budget cuts threatening public sector workers.
The strikers, who have received various levels of support from many unions – including the Professional Staff Congress, United Federation of Teachers, Service Employees International Union and the Transit Workers – came to the rally bearing a message of solidarity.
"When you go out there and you see all those people fighting for the same cause," Dorsu says, "[you] feel a part of something that can make change, that can benefit people."
Two weeks after the City Hall rally, the NLRB issued a preliminary ruling in the Unfair Labor Practice filed by Local 50 in September that found in the union's favor. The case will go to a NLRB hearing in April.
Citing the possibility of a Brynwood appeal, Local 50 President Joyce Alston calls the labor board's ruling "a step in the right direction," but cautions "the battle's not over by any means."
It's a battle that Alston considers "representative of the entire country in terms of working men and women."
"What we're giving is an example," says Stella D'oro striker Eddie Marrero. "You gotta hold your ground no matter what, and take pride in yourself and don't let nobody come in here and say, 'You don't deserve this. You make too much for what you do.'"
"This is where you let them know: I am a human being working for a living," Marrero say.
Joel Cook contributed additional reporting for this article.

A Hispanic for the Supreme Court

Via El Diario La Prensa, 2 April 2009.

Senators Charles Schumer and Kirsten Gillibrand of New York are urging President Obama to appoint a Latino to the United States Supreme Court. EL DIARIO/LA PRENSA joins their call.

Recognizing that the president is likely to have the opportunity to nominate a justice, Schumer and Gillibrand have asked him to consider two high caliber candidates – Judge Sonia Sotomayor and Ken Salazar, secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior.

Latinos are 15 percent of the U.S. population. But you would never know this from looking at the federal judiciary, where only seven percent of judges are Hispanic. That gross underrepresentation must come to an end – at the highest levels.

A native New Yorker, Sotomayor has been supported by both Republicans and Democrats in her appointments to the federal bench. She served as District Court Judge for the Southern District of New York prior to her 1998 appointment to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Salazar, a former senator and attorney general of Colorado, also has a distinguished record. But we must note another glaring imbalance on the Supreme Court: out of its nine justices, only one is a woman.

Should a vacancy emerge on the Court, Sotomayor should be at the top of Obama's list. She is an experienced judge with excellent credentials. And she happens to be Hispanic.

The Supreme Court is a cornerstone of our democracy. Its decisions reverberate throughout the nation, affecting the public and private sectors and everyday citizens. The individuals who uphold this institution must reflect the diversity from which our country draws its strength.

Obama should seize the opportunity to build on his message of inclusion and fairness. The president can make more than a historic appointment – he can set the tone for our children and generations to come.

Bloomberg's Loyal Cult: The Independence Party

Despite mayor's term-limits flip, Independence Party says all is forgiven

By Tom Robbins

Tuesday, April 7th 2009 at 3:03pm

PolitickerNY.com

In a sign of true affection, Michael Bloomberg kisses his Independence Party friends continental-style, on both cheeks. You can see it in a wonderful clip on their website (independentvoting.org), where he thanks Jackie Salit, the elegant and devoted aide to party leader Fred Newman and the woman who ran both of Bloomberg's Independence Party campaigns: kiss to the left—pause, switch cheeks—kiss to the right. They do not miss a beat. It is a lovely little minuet performed by two regal dancers.

On Sunday, they were together again at the Avalon Hotel on East 32nd Street, where the mayor happily sought the Independence Party's endorsement. The party's executive committee considered no other candidates. The mayor spoke for 20 minutes and then, after the media was ushered from the room, answered questions from the committee for another half-hour. He left, amid another flurry of kisses, without speaking to the press.

It is Bloomberg's third time as the party's candidate, which may be one reason they have the kissing part down pat. The mayor twice ran and won on the Republican and Independence party lines, and he is halfway to that goal again, now that the small third party nomination is nailed down. There are few doubts that he'll get the Republican nod as well. It is just taking a little longer for GOP leaders to get over their hurt feelings after Bloomberg publicly quit their party two years ago.

In all likelihood, New Yorkers will get a ballot that lists Bloomberg's name twice, thus giving voters two cracks at pulling the lever for him. This is called fusion politics. A lot of states don't allow it, insisting that if voters are so slow that they can't recognize the name of their chosen candidate the first time they see it, then they probably shouldn't be in the voting booth at all. In New York, we are more understanding, and fusion tickets are a long and cherished tradition here.

The city's two great reform mayors—Seth Low and Fiorello LaGuardia—owed their elections to fusion parties that gave them this crucial extra ballot line. Both men won enough votes this way to beat the old Democratic Tammany clubhouse tiger into submission. Back then, the Fusion Party was an alliance of good government groups and public-minded citizens outraged by the corruption plaguing city government. LaGuardia got Fusion backing only after the great corruption buster himself—Judge Samuel Seabury—said LaGuardia was his man.

Fusion politics is a little different now. LaGuardia had Judge Seabury, relentless investigator and zealous reformer. Bloomberg has Fred Newman, self-proclaimed philosopher and "social therapist."

Newman has been ailing, and failed to make the Sunday meeting at the hotel. But he was ably represented by his protégés, including Salit, the inimitable Lenora Fulani, and a host of other lieutenants who have loyally followed his lead for many years.

For those unfamiliar with Newman and his many groups, there are ample sources to consult. There is his own basic text, Let's Develop!: A Guide to Continuous Personal Growth, which includes his prescription for what he calls "friendosexuality." Roughly translated, this means that mental health can be reached by sleeping with your friends. There is a more rigorous intellectual explanation in Newman's Lev Vygotsky: Revolutionary Scientist, which is billed as a tribute to the "brilliant Russian psychologist."

Newman is also a prolific playwright: His works include Diary of a Mad Therapist, Dead as a Jew, and Outing Wittgenstein (Or Sunday in the Park With Ludwig).

There is also a tape of a marvelous interview conducted by NY1's Rita Nissan in 2005 in the midst of the controversy over the party's support of Bloomberg in the last re-election drive. Nissan spoke to Newman in the Bank Street townhouse that he shares with Salit and several other men and women. Newman collected some of these housemates, he acknowledged, after they sought him out as a therapist. One of his live-in friends is the $200,000-a-year president of the All Stars Project, the nonprofit group that received $9.5 million in tax-free bonds from the city with Bloomberg's support after his 2001 election.

"I don't think it's any of the state's business who my dearest loves are," Newman told Nissan.

Many who joined Newman's program after seeking therapy later fled, insisting that his operation is little more than a cult. That is ridiculous, Newman says, citing the scores of folks who readily work with him.

Bloomberg is back for another round with this crew, thanks to the City Council vote last fall to extend term limits. There were some very powerful speeches made by those opposing the move that day. But watching Salit and the crowd surrounding Bloomberg on Sunday at the hotel made you wonder if the most effective speech in the chamber that October afternoon might have been this: "Has anyone here considered the fact that if we approve this bill, we are going to have to deal with Fred Newman and the Independence Party all over again?"

Speaking of the term limits vote, some of the strongest attacks on the mayor at the Council hearings came from Fulani, the feisty self-described "developmental psychologist" who has long been presented by Newman as the Independence Party's public face.